|
Aren't some aspects of AI public?
This whole AI debate kind of blows my mind. I haven't been reading GC long enought to get why it's such a big deal.
But I do want to point out something that strikes me as a faulty premise: the argument that the AI forum shouldn't exist because information about AI is membership selection, and therefore, ritual.
Recruitment isn't membership selections. Information about what PNM can do to seek information isn't membership selection. Only the whys and hows of members actually being chosen gets to the ritual level, as I see it.
If I can tell an 18 year old how to sign up for rush or COR, why couldn't I tell a 35 year old about AI?
|
Threaded Mode
