I read her column as it is in our local newspaper and I've seen/read some of the rest of the stuff she's done. Her column is flat out poorly written (and has been preempted more than 10 times by my newspaper because she's promoting her book, they gave her once and then yanked it when she didn't write about anything but the book.) As far as debate, name calling and insults do not a debate winner make. Mocking your opponent and his/her stance and not actually addressing the issue doesn't win you a lot of points.
I haven't seen that actually, last I heard she was still in trouble over it. And dropped from a newspaper or two. Now, I looked at some of the comparison between footnotes and quotes and they don't match up, at least not in my opinion. And for what its worth, when you challenge the integrity of someone's writing and that person says "look I have lots of footnotes, it must be right" it just makes me want to
She is an extremist in every sense of the word and I dislike her for that. People like her make it hard for people like me to take either the left or the right seriously. Look I'm Christian and I believe in evolution! On NOes!! Apparently that's impossible according to Coulter/Moore types.
I don't really listen to them because they don't represent me.
Threaded Mode
