Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RACooper
riiiiiight.... with the scrutiny that Israel's assault is under, and the many news groups out there - only the Palestinian News Network manages to scoop this story? 
Anyways as to this alleged "weapon" being used - I also call BS on it. Sorry but the only thing capable of causing burns from the "inside out" and "distorting tissue" would be something along the lines of a microwave or high burst radiation (to have an immediate effect)... and last I checked microwaves don't come in bomb form, and high intensity/burst radiation would immediately show on an x-ray...
For shame _Opi_ to fall for such amatuerish and sloppy propaganda obviously aimed at the already convinced...
Anyways on to your other article - while they cite the Geneva Convention which follows:
They also fail to point out that it is specific in it's application of when this applies; ie. against an occupied civilian population, or attacks specifically directed at terror or intimidation with no strategic/tactical military application... and so far Israel hasn't violated this as far as I can see from news sources.
If they are refering to the broader application under against the collective punishment of enemy civilian populations in times of conflict under 3rd Protocol (1977) then it doesn't matter as none of the combatants (or even possible combatants in the Middle East) have signed onto that protocol.... in fact very few countries have (ie. the UK and US haven't) |
What you said may very well be the truth, as I have no weapon knowledge background. However, as you will notice from my post, I posed a question. I did not say anything about its validity. I saw the article and passed it on. However, I do wonder
if there is validity to it.
As for propoganda, there's many propoganda being perpetrated from both sides :-) We always get reports from the Israel news media here, don't we not?
As to the application of the Geneva convention to this conflict, are you saying because they have a "strategic military planning", that it justifies what their doing in Lebanon/Gaza? You don't think their terrorizing or punishing the civilians , rather than Hizbullah?
Threaded Mode
