Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greekalum
Rudey, my point was: slaughtering an animal is not the same as that animal being able to enter into a legal contract. Hence, there is no requirement for consent to slaughter an animal. There IS currently a requirement that all parties entering into a contract such as the marriage compact be able to consent and in current case law, only a PERSON is capable of consent. Is that clearer?
|
There is nothing in this world more permanent and contractual outside of dying. That is the end all, be all.
And there are legal contracts giving you control, ownership, and possession of animals.
Consent is not an issue. It is your inability to accept that some people may like to marry an animal, have sex with an animal, just as it is the inability of many people to not be comfortable or accept gay sex or gay marriage.
-Rudey
Threaded Mode
