I'm not saying that the alumni shouldn't have input and shouldn't be able to say "you guys are acting like asshats and you need to knock it off" or something of the like. Or kick them out of the house.
But to completely kick someone out, basically overriding the national? What if these guys appeal to the national instead? Plus, it says the interviews were conducted by a
small group of alumni. Re the property damage issue, I searched the paper and there's nothing reported. So I'm guessing it was the general day to day of college age men living in a house and like I said before, that's a HOUSING issue, not a membership issue. The house is not the chapter, and vice versa.
Plus if there was something concrete...well...guys usually just say that. They're not as duplicitous as us ovary bearers.
I'm sorry, but it sounds to me like the alumni don't like the way things were going personally and they wanted to have things the way they wanted them.
Hybrid Mode
