Quote:
Originally posted by Rain Man
Just FYI and speaking for myself only:
My basis for asserting that she is lying has absolutely nothing to do with her profession (though let's be honest; it doesn't help her standing in this case), it has everything to do with her legal priviledge as a woman and the deferential treatment she gets from the law and the government as a result merely on her word alone, irrespective of whether or not it is true.
THAT is what makes me personally suspicious of her and her allegations. Many men have been wrongly imprisoned solely on the word of a scorned woman (with or without the help of a little legal railroading) with no other motive than to be spiteful (and more than a little bit selfish) and that when they cry "Rape", people will immediately come a-running to her side. It's like the little boy who cried "Wolf!"
|
UNLIKE the little boy who cried wolf, the alleged victim had PHYSICAL marks, which indicated that someone had in fact raped her. Whether it was the 3 white men or not, the DA stated, on record that a rape had in fact occurred by the presentation of her injures. That does not seem like a cry that seems like a reality.
I really hope for all who do not believe something happened to this woman, you never have to experience a similar situation. Its easy to judge when we are on the outside looking in but when the DA states that something in fact happened to this women, there is a problem. If it happend to one of you, and your backgrounds or present issues come into play, would you want justice or to be judged on your past or present choices?
Hybrid Mode
