I don't remember the tragedy as I was only three at the time.
However the space camp I worked at summer after freshman year of college did a very powerful briefing to the campers about the tragedy...
While the article says the Reagan Administration didn't order the launch (which is true, there was no "order", there was still political pressure to get the launch going. There was supposed to be the State of the Union address broadcast which helped contribute, but far greater pressure just existed in the program as a whole. The shuttle was supposed to represent, at least to some extent, NASA making money to offset the cost of flights. Part of the reasoning behind a reusable vehicle fleet was that there could be a much greater US presence (in terms of having a flight up) in space without a space station. NASA was essentially using Challenger, Discovery, and Atlantis in rotation. One was in orbit, the other in pre-flight prep/on the pad, and the third in post flight processing. Columbia was being used essentially being stripped for parts for the other shuttles. Challenger was the eleventh launch from January 1985 to January 1986...just amazing how flights they were putting up. That sort of schedule was political pressure and one of many contributing factors to the tragedy...
It's weird because I learned so much about it, and yet very few people my age even remember/have any idea about it.
|