why is Randall selfish??? If he and Rebecca were equally matched, Trump would have hired them both.
The fact is, Rebecca is 23, Randall is 34; Rebecca has written about business, Randall HAS RUN SUCCESSFULLY 5 business. Randall is degreed out the behind, Rebecca isnt. Randall was respected by ALL of his competition, Rebecca wasnt. Randall won all of his challenges; Rebecca did not.
I don't like to put race into anything either, but unfortunately it is always a factor no matter how small. This was a competition and just like Rebecca wasnt backing down, neither should Randall. I seriously doubt Trump was shocked in the way you say. He's been in business for a long time and has seen alot.
I did think that it was going to be a win-fall for both of them. But if I were Randall, I wouldn't want to share either.
To be so young, Rebecca is tight. For a minute, I had forgotten that she was 23. When women are taking care of business like that, it is wonderful to see. This was a great competition. I was never a fan of the show, but I became one tonight!
GO RANDALL.
Quote:
Originally posted by ASUADPi
I personally don't think Randal's decision had anything to do with color, because if it was about color in the first place, Trump would have never hired him. 'Nough said.
Now, not having watched other Apprentice's I don't know if the canidates were ever well matched as the ones from last night. Has Trump ever asked this of the winner before? If not I'm thinking he saw something in both of them that would make them excellent workers for his company. I personally see nothing wrong with wanting to hire both of them.
I may have thought Randal's "no way" attitude was selfish and the way he came back was rude to Rebecca, but in all fairness he didn't expect Trump to ask him the question in the first place and he answered honestly. I think Trump was even shocked by his, I don't know, lack of kindness. (I really can't think of a better term).
I also think that Trump might end up hiring Rebecca, but who knows.
I mean I know for me personally, if I was one of the final two and the other person and I worked extremely well together. We bounced ideas well, we were both strong (where one was lacking the other compensated for). We were just a great team and I was given the oppurtunity to bring this person on board I'd probably jump at it. Now it's not to say that I'd want us to be constantly working together, because otherwise the point of the experience would be meaningless. But Trump did say that he had two projects that needed a manager for them, I wouldn't have had an issue if the other person took on the project I didn't want. Does that make sense?
|
Threaded Mode