USA Today retouches Condi pix: "not biased"

» GLO Specific Forums
Alpha - Beta - Gamma - Delta - Epsilon - Zeta - Eta - Theta - Iota - Kappa - Lambda - Mu - Nu - Xi - Omicron - Pi - Rho - Sigma - Tau - Upsilon - Phi - Chi - Psi - Omega - NGL

Thread Tools

Display Modes

#11

10-27-2005, 05:10 PM

DeltAlum

GreekChat Member

Join Date: Jun 2000

Location: Mile High America

Posts: 17,088

Quote:

Originally posted by AXiD670
Okay, the one on the top doesn't look as bad as the one on the left. Did they re-re-adjust () it?

Personally, I think the original picture doesn't look very flattering either.

Apparently so according to their comments above.

I agree on the original.

I do a fair amount of messing around with electronic pics on photoshop and other programs, and it's not an exact science by any means. Of course my programs are a lot cheaper than anything USA Today would use.

__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.