Quote:
Originally posted by Rain Man
Simply put, Jubilance1922 stated that (paraphrased) one man's idolatry is another man's protocol, and protocol trumps all, including what may be perceived as idolatry. Thus, whether or not anyone explicitly states that their protocol is this extreme is irrelevant.
I agree with you. Furthermore, yes, the word idolatry must be used because that is oftentimes what this whole debate boils down to, protocol aside.
In other words:
(A) I call 'em like I see 'em.
(B) If the shoe fits, wear it.
'Nuff said.
|
If you like it, I love it.
At the end of the day, I doubt that anyone is going to change their opinions or disregard their org's protocol based on the opinions of those on GC. As long as YOUR org's position on letters works for you, it doesn't matter what the other orgs are doing. That was my entire point. If XYZ is cool with "idolatry" as you call it, then what they do shouldn't matter to you.
Hybrid Mode
