A GC Hypothetical

Originally posted by mu_agd
ok, so i'm a pyschotic little stalker b/c i'm friends with these people? even though i knew nothing about it? yeah i don't think that's correct.

Guilt by association, honey. At least in the end YOU'LL still have friends.

[Rudey]

Originally posted by mu_agd
ok, so i'm a pyschotic little stalker b/c i'm friends with these people? even though i knew nothing about it? yeah i don't think that's correct.

If you read my post I said these people not people who are friends with these people. I didn't say anything about you ever.

-Rudey

[mu_agd]

Originally posted by Rudey
If you read my post I said these people not people who are friends with these people. I didn't say anything about you ever.

-Rudey

but your post said "all your friends". wouldn't that include me?

[Rudey]

Originally posted by mu_agd
but your post said "all your friends". wouldn't that include me?

"You and whomever else was involved"

Again I haven't said a single bad thing about you ever have I?

-Rudey

[mu_agd]

Originally posted by Rudey
"You and whomever else was involved"

Again I haven't said a single bad thing about you ever have I?

-Rudey

no, and that's why i didn't get it.

[James]

Daaaymmm, I think you just lost your moral high card in the game of nice versus meaness.

Your post doesn't even make sense in context because its not being bitchy to Jules at all, if anyone it should be freaking out right now its Mullet, since she is the one I am insulting. I am surpirsed you would defend mullet.

However, it is rather clever to say I am a skeezy 30, 40, 50, 60 or whatever guy that has used my 5 years on GC to try and pick all you girls up.

I mean just reading that looks pretty bad. Damn, I mean I know me, and I even think I must be some perv trolling along trying pick pre adolescents that their mommies leave unguarded.

(in a spooky voice)"Want some candy little girl . . . "

But thats part of what we mean when we are talking about you and the harem Sugar and Spice.

You guys don't attack the message. We would all understand that.

You guys will gang up and attack the messenger. You will make snide comments about them or insult them in an effort to discredit them so that their views are not taken seriously.

James is a perv that is stalking GC girls online . . . wow, who is going to listen to him? Is he credible? Run away all girls on GC

You would think John would have banned a moderator that does that by now. 5 years of picking up GC women. Go James.

Originally posted by sugar and spice
Oh honey, was that ever low.

Everybody in this thread knows that the only reason you're being so bitchy to J. is because she's the one who outed you as a 32-year-old skeeze trying to pick up college girls on the internet. I kept my lips zipped on that particular point because I didn't feel like I needed to aim below the belt with you, but since you went there first . . .

One percent pure trash to pull that shit on J. when you know she's not around to defend herself. Speaking of "tubby" -- pot, kettle, honey?

As I am not supposed to use discuss R**** anymore because apparently that qualifies as stalking him, I will not even bother to go into detail, but to clear some misconceptions up:

1) R.'s information was posted LONG before the incident with RACooper
2) Apparently you skipped over the part in the "Roll call" thread where I pointed out that it was not even entirely the H&A the posted his info?
3) Nobody except those "in the know" had a friggin' clue what his information alluded to. Ask the mods who were asked to delete it -- they thought it had something to do with his religious beliefs until they were set straight.
4) Contrary to what R. might have you believe, I've played a minimal role in anything related to "stalking" him. The people who have played the largest roles are those that he is still friendly with and that he talks to on a regular basis. I've taken the blame for my place in the baby pic debacle and that's about all I can own up to. R. just likes to whine because he thrives on attention.
5) It took about five minutes total for anyone to figure out R.'s full name given the information gleaned from GC. I want to point that out as a warning to anybody who posts here -- if anybody really wanted to gut R., they wouldn't have had too tough of a time figuring out where to find him.

[33girl]

Originally posted by sugar and spice
I think that the fact that most of the H&A have more interesting things to aspire to than the GC sorority girl ideals of "nice" and "sweet" is a little off-putting.

You have GOT to be kidding me. Heather, have you gone round the proverbial bend???

"GC sorority girl ideals"???? If nice and sweet are GC sorority girl ideals, KillarneyRose, shadokat, kddani and myself (to name but a few people) would have been out of here looooooong ago. But no one seems to start threads about us being mean or bitchy.

If you feel like GC is trying to push you into some mold, that's YOUR perspective - and if it gives you strength in your journey to self empowerment, umm, OK whatever. This is just such a bizarre thing to say I couldn't help but respond.

And as far as James - hello!! get with the program!! He's not 32, he's into bestiality. (Which reminds me James - this damn bighorn sheep has eaten all the grass out of my yard and my neighbors are getting irate - can you come and pick it up soon please?)

[James]

You know . . . (James says in a slow drawl) . . I still have a REALLY bad itch from the last sheep you brought over . . could we switch to goats?

Plus we can use them in Ritual afterwards in the new secret society we can create on GC

Ritual demands goats.

Originally posted by 33girl
(Which reminds me James - this damn bighorn sheep has eaten all the grass out of my yard and my neighbors are getting irate - can you come and pick it up soon please?)

[Lindz928]

James, I thought you were an 80 year old dwarf.... That's a little too old, but 70 is perfect. You can stalk me anytime.

[AXO Alum]

Originally posted by 33girl
And as far as James - hello!! get with the program!! He's not 32, he's into bestiality. (Which reminds me James - this damn bighorn sheep has eaten all the grass out of my yard and my neighbors are getting irate - can you come and pick it up soon please?)

ROFLMBO -- too funny

[HotDamnImAPhiMu]

I don't know that saying GC supports being "sweet" and "nice" means the only way to establishing an identity is to be nasty to people.

[damasa]

After a failed attempt to make a late dinner I have decided to go to Wendys. When I return this thread better be dead.

If not I'm going to start handing out neckchops like a hooker gives $10 BJs. In the meantime I'm sure RC will hold it down.


(He'll get your ass worse than I will.)

[adduncan]

In before the lock.
Sorry, it had to be done.

--add

[James]

Heavy irony.

Originally posted by sugar and spice

For anybody who continues to complain about how I get off on being mean, I have another challenge for you (since the first one obviously went over your heads): go back through my posts and list the situations where you think I've been "mean." Send me a PM with a list of all these instances. Offhand, I can think of ONE instance that was genuinely mean-spirited. I'm willing to admit that there may be a few others that have slipped my mind -- but for two years on GC and as many posts as I have, I can't say that that's a terrible record. First person to prove me wrong gets the satisfaction of knowing that I am, in fact, a cold-hearted bitch.

Go.

[sugar and spice]

Originally posted by James

Oh and as I pointed out before I am much older than 32, while in the process of picking up all the GC chicks as you put it. You are underestimating that number by a lot. Maybe its because I am so much older you that I find this stuff less significant.

I originally guessed 43 . . . is that closer?

And if you were referring to mullet, I'm not sure "tubby" is the most accurate description. But I'm hoping you'll forgive my misreading of your post since I was a little preoccupied earlier . . .


*** For those of you playing the Count-the-mean-posts-that-s&s makes game at home, I'll give you my previous response to James for free.

Originally posted by 33girl

"GC sorority girl ideals"???? If nice and sweet are GC sorority girl ideals, KillarneyRose, shadokat, kddani and myself (to name but a few people) would have been out of here looooooong ago. But no one seems to start threads about us being mean or bitchy.

I'm sure you know that the handful of you are the exception rather than the rule, and I'm sure that you also know that there have been allusions to bitchiness in regards to a few of you off the site (if not on it). (Not to mention the fact that there are many women on this site, while being first class b*tches themselves, are quite ready to put other people in their places for the same damn behavior that they themselves display on a daily basis because apparently it's not "appropriate sorority girl behavior" . . . ideals and actual behavior are not necessarily congruous.)

I'm sure you also know -- because I know this is one of your pet issues -- that the "cliquiness" in combination with the lack of sweetness and roses is what really gets to people. But, uh, as I've pointed out before, I don't agree that any condemnation of cliques on a GLO website is valid. As I've said time and time again, I think it's fascinating that so many people who are GLO members have such a bizarre aversion to cliques.

HotDamn, for all your references as to how nasty I apparently am, I'm still waiting for that list of all the times I've been mean on GC -- surely, if I'm that mean, it wouldn't take you all that long to come up with a decent-sized list of infractions.

PS: Dear everyone, valkyrie is not Internet Lawyer. Neither is Kath (clearly, since Kath has been on vacation for the past week). As stated previously, IL is not a member of the H&A -- not that that would really give you much to work with since most of y'all don't even know who comprises this illustrious organization.