Quote:
Originally posted by whtwudusay
Now, this is slightly off topic, but if you disagree with university's programs like this, how do you feel about standards in general? Who should hold GLO's accountable? I ask this, because standards are the future in GLO's, especially NIC Fraternities with the standards initiative that is being put into place.
Again, I'm not trying to start trouble, just interested in everyone's perspective.
|
Especially for fraternities, it is up to each individual fraternity and their national officers to hold their groups accountable and determine what is important. I say "especially for fraternities" because there are SUCH huge differences throughout the IFC. Some groups want to get huge, some concsiously stay small. If you have a Greek advisor who thinks that huge chapters and huge nationals are the way to go, it's going to be hard on the smaller groups, even if they are the groups that would be best for the campus.
We give out "four star chapter" awards to chapters who excel, but we don't single out those who don't.
Threaded Mode