A GC Hypothetical

Originally posted by HotDamnImAPhiMu
You know what, Sandy? That was a really mean response to Kelly's perfectly polite and understandable post.

Kelly basically said (as I understand it, Kelly, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong,) that it's difficult for other GCers to join the anti-whoever campaign in light of the relative lack of information you ladies have posted.

She didn't challenge the statements made so far.

She didn't make reference to the H&A.

She didn't suggest that you were telling anything else other than the absolute truth.

She simply stated -- very diplomatically, I might add, I think I would have had trouble wording things quite so nicely -- that if you want more support and understanding from the GC community at large, it's reasonable to expect to have to provide more specifics.

I wasn't replying to Kelly. Check it again.

Kelly has been around GC a long time, and though I can't remember ever really "butting heads" with her, I know her well enough on GC to NOT to reply to her in the manner you called "mean".