Quote:
Originally posted by The1calledTKE
Even some Republicans think Kerry would be just as strong in defense that Bush if. John McCain being the most vocal.
The scare tactic vote for Bush or the terrorist wins is a weak one. It's more like an act of desperation because usually a candidate wins with his merits not by scaring people into voting for him.
Kerry already said he would have them stay in Iraq till the job was finished because we shouldn't leave the country in a mess. And to say any candidate would let the country fall apart and let terrorist attack out country without trying to do anything to stop it is weak. Every candidate has America security tops on their list. Just because some would not have invaded Iraq to start does not mean anything. Oh yes we really prevented terrorism by invading Iraq. All the Arab and Muslim world loves us now because of it. I think we helped make more terrorist and will be more likely to be attacked on our soil now that before the Iraq war.
|
Actually stop acting as if Democrats would not have invaded Iraq. Kerry voted to invade. People like Hillary Clinton, who is considered one of the most prominent Democrats, also want to. The difference is in the aftermath, with Clinton saying she thinks we didn't devote enough resources to it and bungled it up while Kerry voted against funding after Saddam fell.
-Rudey
Threaded Mode