Quote:
Originally posted by someblueguy:
-well, first off... i am a member of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. i want to say that no sorority or fraternity can truly lay claim to the words 'frat' or 'soror' when referring to a counterpart group except Zeta Phi Beta and Phi Beta Sigma, off tops!
|
Hey Someblueguy its cool to see a Sigma posting it doesn't happen alot, anyway if the Divine Nine recoginizes that Sigma and Zeta are the first "constitutionally bound" which i believe we all do, then do you have a problem and if so why? when groups that were started before your own already had and continue to have a brother/sister or frat/soror type of bond. (which can not be mandated, like you should be in love with your spouse before you get the marriage certificate, that's just a legal document it has nothing to do with the love you already have between the two of you) They did not choose or see the need to make it constitutionally bond. I respect the fact that you guys are constitutionally bound but i don't understand why their is a problem with relationships such as Alpha/AKA and Omega/Delta (which can vary from campus to campus but as a whole) that have been around longer then your own organization. Is it that you find people negating the validity of your bond with your sorors or is it that you just do not like seeing others share the same bond. Help a sista out Sigma Man
and i would prefer/but not limit this to hearing from the Sigma Bruhs since they initiated the constitutional bond idea in its inception.
Threaded Mode