Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek
No, Zach. You’re wrong. A lot of people are in prison because they didn’t have the money or political reach to bury evidence, pay off silence, or stall the system until the public moved on. That’s the difference.
You think a mugshot and orange jumpsuit are what define guilt? lol. Nope. They don’t. The real predators wear suits, shake hands on golf courses, and have legal teams whose only job is to muzzle the truth. And when that doesn’t work, they cut settlement checks big enough to shut down entire newsrooms.
And let’s not pretend the man who’s dodged rape allegations, defamation rulings, and multiple fraud charges is just the victim of “circumstantial suspicion.” He didn’t just appear in Epstein’s world, he was a recurring character in the credits. Private jet flights. Dinner parties. Public defenses. It wasn’t a photo op, it was a pattern.
So no, this isn’t about whether there’s a verdict. It’s about whether people can still recognize guilt when it hides behind money, lawyers, and delays.
|
I’m not disagreeing with you. In fact, you’re right. I’m just saying everybody deserves a fair shot in court, regardless of who it is (whether you like the person or not). Does everybody get that fair shot? No. But me personally, I don’t take sides when it comes to having rights in this country. Everybody deserves the same rights and fair treatment. It’s sad that some people get overlooked. Yeah, Trump has done some dirt, but I wouldn’t make an automatic connection to somebody else’s dirt just because he was hanging around them.
For example. I’m sure you have a circle of close friends you hang with on a regular. If one of them did something foul or corrupt, do you think because you hang around them that you’re foul or corrupt too? Do you think that’d be a fair assessment of you, knowing you’re not like that person?
Threaded Mode
