GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Recruitment > Sorority Recruitment

Sorority Recruitment Recruitment event and bid day ideas, membership retention, publicity, recruitment policies, etc.

» GC Stats
Members: 332,730
Threads: 115,737
Posts: 2,208,355
Welcome to our newest member, taylrusasdo3764
» Online Users: 2,910
0 members and 2,910 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2015, 03:12 AM
LAblondeGPhi LAblondeGPhi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GMT + 2
Posts: 841
Honestly, I think the "inviting everyone back" reputation can and does persist in environments when a chapter IS NOT inviting everyone back. Look at the Indiana system where the "weakest" chapters are cutting lots and lots of women - and they still get that kind of reputation. You probably won't get very far trying to change the invitation system, and I would recommend putting your efforts elsewhere.

Your advisor is following the RFM (Release Figures Methodology) numbers that are given to all the chapters on your campus. There is pressure for every NPC organization to follow the RFM guidelines for each campus, because there can be penalties (less leeway, fewer quota additions, etc.) for NOT following the guidelines. There was an extensive discussion about it in this recent thread:
Dealing with mean PNMs


Here are other great threads on the topic:
The Best Strategy for a "Weak Recruiting" Chapter

Low-tier recruiting strategy


Do you know what DOES help with allowing you to release more women? Recruiting better. I have been the recruitment advisor with chapters that suddenly had significantly higher return rates than previous years', and thanks to RFM, there's a "flex list" that automatically releases extra women when you have a higher return rate. I've even gotten frantic early-morning calls to add more women to the flex list because we were able to release even more women.

Ok, end of RFM rant.

To your question about getting elected:
Do you research and your homework. Have a great plan as to what you'd do to improve recruitment. In my experience, most women don't really campaign for positions during sorority elections - but if you want the job - show the women that you have a plan and strategy.

Talk to the current recruitment chair and recruitment advisor. Let them know that you're interested in the job and that you'd like to learn more about what they think you should know about the job, what they're experience has been, what they would like you to do this year. It can really help get the buzz going for you if the previous recruitment chair is publicly backing you.

To be successful in your job:
I notice that most of your suggestions are PR-related. That is all probably going to be the job of the PR chair, so recognize that you're not going to be in charge of a lot of that. It can be a good cooperation with your PR chair, but it's a little tangential to your main job.

Your focus: CONVERSATION!!! I say this in almost every thread that pops up on this topic: the number one issue for most weak-recruiting chapters is CONVERSATION. To quote what I said in another thread:

In my personal experience, the #1 problem that weak-recruiting chapters have is that members aren't very good conversationalists. If you look through the recruitment stories on this site, it's an extremely common pattern: PNMs complain of awkward conversations at their least-favorite chapters. And it's a cycle: strong chapters tend to recruit the star conversationalists, weaker chapters tend to recruit the women who don't shine during formal recruitment and cocktail conversations.

Check out a couple of books:
I Heart Recruitment
How to Win Friends and Influence People



I bet that most people in your chapter don't have a very accurate picture of who your best recruitment conversationalists are. This happened in my chapter, too. We assumed that the most outgoing/well liked people in the chapter were the best at recruitment conversation, and this is not always the case. Look at having alumnae and/or advisors come in an do assessments (mock conversations) with each woman to figure out who's good, who needs work, and what people need help on.

Work on studying your PNMs ahead of time - KNOW them. Know how to pair them to your sisters based on shared interests in the first rounds, and then on personality in the later rounds.

If you're not pairing your PNMs to your sisters, figure out how to do that.

Did I mention work on conversation? Ya - do that. Also make sure that your sisters can talk easily about any aspect of your sorority and know what activities other sisters are involved in.

Read through the recruitment stories on here - you'll easily see what kinds of things are consistently influential to PNMs (hint: decor is rarely a factor, so keep it elegant and simple if you can).

Good luck!
__________________
I heart Gamma Phi Beta

Last edited by LAblondeGPhi; 05-16-2015 at 03:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2015, 10:32 AM
sisterlylove sisterlylove is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAblondeGPhi View Post
Honestly, I think the "inviting everyone back" reputation can and does persist in environments when a chapter IS NOT inviting everyone back. Look at the Indiana system where the "weakest" chapters are cutting lots and lots of women - and they still get that kind of reputation. You probably won't get very far trying to change the invitation system, and I would recommend putting your efforts elsewhere.

Your advisor is following the RFM (Release Figures Methodology) numbers that are given to all the chapters on your campus. There is pressure for every NPC organization to follow the RFM guidelines for each campus, because there can be penalties (less leeway, fewer quota additions, etc.) for NOT following the guidelines. There was an extensive discussion about it in this recent thread:
Dealing with mean PNMs


Here are other great threads on the topic:
The Best Strategy for a "Weak Recruiting" Chapter

Low-tier recruiting strategy


Do you know what DOES help with allowing you to release more women? Recruiting better. I have been the recruitment advisor with chapters that suddenly had significantly higher return rates than previous years', and thanks to RFM, there's a "flex list" that automatically releases extra women when you have a higher return rate. I've even gotten frantic early-morning calls to add more women to the flex list because we were able to release even more women.

Ok, end of RFM rant.

To your question about getting elected:
Do you research and your homework. Have a great plan as to what you'd do to improve recruitment. In my experience, most women don't really campaign for positions during sorority elections - but if you want the job - show the women that you have a plan and strategy.

Talk to the current recruitment chair and recruitment advisor. Let them know that you're interested in the job and that you'd like to learn more about what they think you should know about the job, what they're experience has been, what they would like you to do this year. It can really help get the buzz going for you if the previous recruitment chair is publicly backing you.

To be successful in your job:
I notice that most of your suggestions are PR-related. That is all probably going to be the job of the PR chair, so recognize that you're not going to be in charge of a lot of that. It can be a good cooperation with your PR chair, but it's a little tangential to your main job.

Your focus: CONVERSATION!!! I say this in almost every thread that pops up on this topic: the number one issue for most weak-recruiting chapters is CONVERSATION. To quote what I said in another thread:

In my personal experience, the #1 problem that weak-recruiting chapters have is that members aren't very good conversationalists. If you look through the recruitment stories on this site, it's an extremely common pattern: PNMs complain of awkward conversations at their least-favorite chapters. And it's a cycle: strong chapters tend to recruit the star conversationalists, weaker chapters tend to recruit the women who don't shine during formal recruitment and cocktail conversations.

Check out a couple of books:
I Heart Recruitment
How to Win Friends and Influence People



I bet that most people in your chapter don't have a very accurate picture of who your best recruitment conversationalists are. This happened in my chapter, too. We assumed that the most outgoing/well liked people in the chapter were the best at recruitment conversation, and this is not always the case. Look at having alumnae and/or advisors come in an do assessments (mock conversations) with each woman to figure out who's good, who needs work, and what people need help on.

Work on studying your PNMs ahead of time - KNOW them. Know how to pair them to your sisters based on shared interests in the first rounds, and then on personality in the later rounds.

If you're not pairing your PNMs to your sisters, figure out how to do that.

Did I mention work on conversation? Ya - do that. Also make sure that your sisters can talk easily about any aspect of your sorority and know what activities other sisters are involved in.

Read through the recruitment stories on here - you'll easily see what kinds of things are consistently influential to PNMs (hint: decor is rarely a factor, so keep it elegant and simple if you can).

Good luck!
Wow thank you for such a thorough response! You have some really great tips. I never thought about the fact that social media wouldn't even be my job. Our PR chair literally just started and I think she'll do great things- we have elections in the fall but our PR chair dropped and she was elected with only two chapter meetings left in the year.

I will definitely focus more on conversation. I'm worried though because girls at our workshops often get really annoyed about recruitment conversation- the ones who have done recruitment before seem to feel like the information is redundant and some people just complained about how much they hate recruitment. Any advice to change this attitude? I think our past recruitment co-chairs did a great job yet some girls still had a bad stigma attached to the whole process.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2015, 12:07 PM
OPhiAGinger OPhiAGinger is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by sisterlylove
I'm worried though because girls at our workshops often get really annoyed about recruitment conversation- the ones who have done recruitment before seem to feel like the information is redundant and some people just complained about how much they hate recruitment. Any advice to change this attitude?
Your sisters may be thinking of recruitment conversations as interviews where they ask and answer questions. Instead, they should think of themselves as the ultimate hostess whose job is to make each pnm feel like she is understood and welcomed as an individual. Thinking like that will help them go beyond the boring routine questions about major, hometown, etc (which turn off the pnms, too) and launch into each pnm's unique passion. A good conversationalist doesn't need to share that passion; she just needs to have a genuine interest and be able to draw her conversation partner out more.

So if the pnm mentions that she just got back from New Zealand last week, the sister would follow with "Seriously, you spent the summer in New Zealand? OMG, I'm so envious! I've always wanted to travel more and New Zealand is definitely on my list. How long were you there? What experience left the strong impression on you while you were there?" From there you can branch out naturally into other travel related topics, following the pnm's lead. If she has a great sense of humor, you may wind up swapping stories about the worst people to be seated next to on a long flight. If she seems more philanthropy focused, your conversation may veer into mission work opportunities abroad. The point is to let it flow naturally and steer it toward topics that allow the pnm to expand on her passions. That's the kind of conversation that makes the pnm feel special, like she made one of those mythical "connections".

Great conversationalist don't do the majority of the talking. They gently steer the conversation and pay close attention to their partner's verbal and nonverbal clues, but the other person unconsciously winds up doing most of the talking. That's the skill you should strengthen in your chapter. The "hostess" has to be totally engaged in the moment, not thinking about how hot the room is or wondering when she'll be bumped or why her boyfriend didn't call last night. For people who are naturally engaged in the moment, this type of conversation comes easily. But the rest of us can be taught this level of focus.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2015, 12:17 PM
sisterlylove sisterlylove is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPhiAGinger View Post

Great conversationalist don't do the majority of the talking. They gently steer the conversation and pay close attention to their partner's verbal and nonverbal clues, but the other person unconsciously winds up doing most of the talking. That's the skill you should strengthen in your chapter. The "hostess" has to be totally engaged in the moment, not thinking about how hot the room is or wondering when she'll be bumped or why her boyfriend didn't call last night. For people who are naturally engaged in the moment, this type of conversation comes easily. But the rest of us can be taught this level of focus.
I really like the hostess analogy! Our current recruitment chairs received survey results and one of our negative aspects that was mentioned (I don't know how frequently, but nevertheless it was said) was that we talk about ourselves too much. I think girls do that when they get nervous and when they can't come up with more generic questions like major and hometown they freak out. Really though, shouldn't we focus more on expanding more on each question? Ex:

"So what's your major?"
"Psychology."
"Oh that's really awesome I have so many friends who are psych majors! Why'd you choose it?"

Or is it better just to get those questions out of the way asap and move on?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Best Strategy for a "Weak Recruiting" Chapter DeltaBetaBaby Sorority Recruitment 110 07-29-2023 10:53 AM
Newly Elected Social Chair AOPii Social 10 06-03-2012 04:24 PM
Just Elected Philanthropy Chair Nema Community Service / Philanthropy 9 08-27-2010 03:12 AM
Que elected Chair of Board of Directors of Bank of America Wolfman Omega Psi Phi 2 05-06-2009 12:59 PM
Newly elected recruitment chair crazydphie Recruitment 6 03-28-2004 11:49 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.