GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Sigma > Sigma Alpha Epsilon

» GC Stats
Members: 331,208
Threads: 115,703
Posts: 2,207,389
Welcome to our newest member, abryantts9093
» Online Users: 3,959
2 members and 3,957 guests
JeffreyStoge
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 03-09-2014, 03:52 PM
AOII Angel AOII Angel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby View Post
One question that I'm hoping an SAE can answer, but slap my hand if I'm too close to membership selection:

How difficult is it, comparatively, to remove a pledge? Does the fact that someone has been initiated make it much harder to throw them out of your chapter?

My experience on the NPC side has been that it takes a *lot* to get rid of an NM, and that most orgs don't let chapters make that decision on their own (i.e. it has to be run up the volunteer alumnae chain), so initiating early wouldn't make a huge difference in terms of kicking someone out.

Of course, if a chapter really wants to get rid of someone, they pressure her to leave "voluntarily," but I am curious how much the early initiation matters on this issue alone.
I think you hit the nail on the head. The NPC made the change years ago to equate a bid with a PROMISE to initiate. Essentially by issuing a bid you have decided that the new member has all the qualifications to become a member of the organization. The new member period is not a time for the NM to EARN her letters or prove herself but to learn about the organization and decide if SHE wants to continue on to initiation.

It sounds like SAE is trying to change to this model and have its chapters have more of a values based approach. Bid equals initiation. Fit is no longer the goal and prospective members no longer need to prove their worth with tasks but by their merit.

It's a big change, and unfortunately the idea of proving yourself by doing physical and mental challenges is hard wired by this point in the fraternity system. Friendships outside the fraternal movement don't rely on this model but somehow we expect it in a fraternity. The biggest problem is that no one likes change. It may not be this change, but I will say that change isn't going to come from the collegiate members. In the end, change is needed to avoid the harsh realities of liability issues. There is only so far you can go with paying higher and higher insurance rates before at some point you can no longer afford those rates or obtain a policy to cover you.
__________________

AOII

One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!




Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Northwestern: Sigma Phi Epsilon Suspension & Membership Review exlurker Greek Life 2 08-14-2012 03:26 PM
U of New Hampshire: "Sanctions" for Pi Kappa Alpha, Sigma Alpha Epsilon and Alpha Phi exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 0 02-25-2012 05:44 PM
Epsilon Sigma Alpha AngelPhiSig Beta Sigma Phi 4 01-14-2008 06:42 PM
Kappa Sigma announces re-colonization of two historic Chapters docetboy Greek Life 8 04-28-2003 10:22 PM
Sigma Alpha Epsilon Pi Forito Baroulko Greek Life 4 06-30-2002 09:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.