Survivor: Blood vs. Water (Fall 2013)

[SydneyK]

Alright, Tyson's strategy is to get rid of the couples, right? And that's why he wanted to vote out Laura, right? Here's my question about that... Since RI is still in play, and we know that (at least?) one of the players from RI will rejoin the tribe, wouldn't it make more sense to get both family members on RI (like Arras and Vytas were) in order to make it impossible for someone to come back and join their loved one? By having both Tina and Laura on RI, if either one of them wins, the tribe will still have to deal with a team.

Just trying to figure out why Tyson thought it was better to vote Laura instead of Katie. Especially since Ciara said she would vote out her mom (and then followed through)...

[Cheerio]

Originally Posted by SydneyK

Alright, Tyson's strategy is to get rid of the couples, right? Just trying to figure out why Tyson thought it was better to vote Laura instead of Katie.

Every All Star is a threat because they've played SURVIVOR before, so Laura had to go. Only ONE person eventually comes back from R.I., and it COULD be Vytas (newbie). Tyson probably knows the strategies of returnees, but can glean easy strategy info from newbies who don't know enough to shut up.

Will there be a final three or Final Two? There are 11 people involved. A final 2 means nine jury votes. Final 3 has eight jury votes, unless CBS has the public vote for a winner and count that as one vote to break possible 4-4 tie.

Tyson will probably keep a player that does not need the money (Monica) and a useless-to-the-tribe newbie (or useless Returnee if he has to) for his final three.