GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 329,774
Threads: 115,673
Posts: 2,205,426
Welcome to our newest member, anaswifto2339
» Online Users: 3,933
0 members and 3,933 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #36  
Old 12-01-2011, 04:48 PM
Low C Sharp Low C Sharp is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 678
Quote:
I had also thought it was kind of an unspoken understanding that nobody actually use the armrest, but rather keep your elbow in your own lap.
Hm, I choose window seats, and I never begrudge the armrest to the person in the middle. IMHO, the shared armrests ought to belong to the middle seater -- though this doesn't work on widebody planes with a row of 5 in the middle.

I'm interested by the article, though I question the author's request that airlines need to make accommodations "without surcharging the people who require slightly more space than others." If you need more baggage space, they surcharge you for it. That's true even if you are carrying the extra bag for an important reason that outside your control -- even if it contains your samples for a sales trip or mementos your dying mother requested at her bedside. More space and weight, more money. Why shouldn't we all be able to pay for more seat space, regardless of whether we are big or small? There are lots of short people who are happy to pay more for the extra legroom United offers on Economy Plus. (As far as I know, that's the only major domestic carrier that has this option.) How can the author know that a given smaller person is necessarily less comfortable in a small seat than a given big person? Some small people have claustrophobia, back pain, etc. that might make their flight far more miserable in a tiny seat than it would be for a big person without those problems.

Also, it's not about the amount space the airline has arbitrarily decided we "deserve" -- it's about the amount of space that they offered for sale and that we agreed to purchase. If you want more than what is on offer, pay more. No other consumer product is discounted on the basis of need.* I just don't agree that any customer has the right to fly at the very cheap prices we've gotten used to in the 2000s. 30 years ago, we transacted plenty of business and people got to their mother's deathbeds just fine even though flights were far more expensive. In real dollars, two seats on Southwest today is cheaper than one seat on TWA in 1980. We all got by.

*If you live in a snowy rural area and you need 4WD on your truck, the dealer doesn't give you that upgrade for free because you need it, while it would just be a luxury for city dwellers. Sometimes our needs just cost more, and we can't expect merchants to eat that extra cost for us.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flight 93 honeychile Entertainment 17 02-01-2006 11:06 PM
Fess up fatty PiKA2001 Chit Chat 14 01-14-2006 12:11 AM
Best way to see how booked a flight is? Rudey Chit Chat 13 08-04-2005 06:00 PM
Had a flight since 9/11? AKA2D '91 Alpha Kappa Alpha 8 08-26-2002 09:47 PM
Angel Flight carnation Chit Chat 10 01-03-2002 04:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.