GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 333,733
Threads: 115,758
Posts: 2,208,946
Welcome to our newest member, anathanchvs6993
» Online Users: 3,893
0 members and 3,893 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2009, 12:26 PM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl View Post
Elementary school and high school are different than college. Period. They're paid for by the taxpayers . . . .
So are many colleges, at least in part -- sometimes quite a large part.

I just don't see any problem at all with a college requiring a physical education/health component for all baccalaureate degrees. I'd say historically, it has been the rule rather than the exception.

I do quibble with (okay, laugh at) what has sometimes passed for phys ed/health at many colleges and universities, and I think Lincoln has gone about it all wrong, but I think a college education is about more than just getting a degree so you can go forth and work. College should be much more than an expensive training school.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2009, 12:48 PM
pbear19 pbear19 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: StL
Posts: 946
I took a 100-level health course in college because it was required of all students. I can't honestly say that I learned anything, but it wasn't a bad thing to have to take it.

Something else I just thought of: It's really short-sighted to single out the high-BMI students for this class for another reason. How many of the <30 BMI crowd know next to nothing about how to eat healthy because they are young and have never had to worry about it? What happens to them in 5 or 10 years when life suddenly catches up with them? Wouldn't it be a good idea to give them the skills and knowledge now so that they understand their unhealthy habits aren't going to fly in a few years? Or does the administration of the university just assume that those who are relatively thin now will always be like that? Heh. I can see how an 18 year old would think that. But I would have thought a college administrator would know better. Sometimes the people who have the worst health problems down the line are the ones who are thin and can eat any kind of junk they want when they are young, so they never learn the difference.

If the university really cared about its students, all students would be required to take the course.

@Sydney - Sounds like you are making the assumption that anyone with a 30+ BMI is inactive. There are a *lot* of overweight people who are quite active. Ever heard of the Athena and Clydesdale classes in running?
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
To inspire the highest type of womanhood.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2009, 01:10 PM
SydneyK SydneyK is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbear19 View Post
@Sydney - Sounds like you are making the assumption that anyone with a 30+ BMI is inactive. There are a *lot* of overweight people who are quite active.
Nope. Not making that assumption at all. I'm sure there are people who have a high BMI who are active. But, if I were a betting person, I'd put money on 30+ BMI people, as a whole, being less active than below 30 BMI.
__________________
Never let the facts stand in the way of a good answer. -Tom Magliozzi
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2009, 01:19 PM
pbear19 pbear19 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: StL
Posts: 946
Question for anyone who is ok with the class being just for the 30+ BMI crowd:

Why do you think the university should not require this course of every student? Do you think that the "thin" students have nothing to learn, and are never going to be at risk of gaining weight? Do you genuinely think that the "thin" students are healthy, and have sufficient knowledge about health and fitness? Or is there some other reason?

I'm just really curious why the course shouldn't be required of everyone.
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
To inspire the highest type of womanhood.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kansas- Fight fire with fire Floridaboyz Lambda Chi Alpha 4 05-14-2007 03:20 PM
conservative morons cancel college's study abroad program due to Spain's war stance IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 27 03-07-2005 08:24 PM
The Rule of Four Nikki_DZ Entertainment 1 06-30-2004 12:45 PM
Fighting fire with fire Adelphean1851 Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 3 04-12-2004 07:58 PM
Dartmouth College's SigEp Host Wesley Clark moe.ron Greek Life 0 01-14-2004 09:22 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.