GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Alpha > Alpha Kappa Alpha

» GC Stats
Members: 333,729
Threads: 115,758
Posts: 2,208,946
Welcome to our newest member, charlesgoogleto
» Online Users: 5,288
2 members and 5,286 guests
Jamesrof, Xidelt
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 11-02-2008, 11:47 PM
KAPital PHINUst KAPital PHINUst is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 913
Quote:
Originally Posted by SummerChild View Post
KPN,
Why are people so much more comfortable with the *state* or the *local government* controlling them than the *federal government*?
Good question, though one item I would like to clear up:

It is not a matter of the people being "controlled" by any governmental entity, but rather a proper and proportional balance of power by all parties involved: the people, the state, and the federal government.

All Articles of the Constitution addresses the roles and powers of the Federal Government, while and the first 8 of the 10 Bills of Rights addresses the means by which the federal government exercises its powers. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments by default relegates any powers not addressed previously in the Constitution to the people (Ninth Amendment) or to the States (Tenth Amendment).

Now as far as people being controlled by the State, if the State infringes on a person's rights or if the person has a grievance with the State, this is where the Eleventh Amendment supposedly comes into play. A citizen can sue the State in Federal court. A state does not have soverign immunity in such actions.

Ideally, the Federal government was intended to serve as a mediator between the people and the state, allowing the States to govern themselves accordingly while allowing the people life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

I am oversimplifying this for the sake of brevity, but my point was that the federal government was NEVER intended to serve its own interests over that of its people or outside of the powers originally allowed to it by the United States Constitution, but was to serve at the pleasure of its people and to serve as referee between the people and the State, using the Constitution as a guide.

Quote:
I have never understood this. What is the difference between the feds being in control and the states being in control? Does having the state be in control make you feel more comfortable? Why?
Because when you govern using the Constitution as a guide, you have a strong system of checks and balances instead of the rogue legislation practices and a string of un-Constitutional acts and executive orders, as you see now.
__________________
Diamonds Are Forever, and Nupes are For Your Eyes Only

KAY<>FNP
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conventions VIOLETGRL24 News & Politics 38 10-28-2007 01:23 PM
NPC & NIC: When and Where are your Next Conventions? KillarneyRose Greek Life 22 08-02-2004 05:52 PM
Kerry winner in Iowa Caucuses ISUKappa News & Politics 34 01-21-2004 04:46 PM
Conventions erica812 Beta Sigma Phi 15 04-07-2003 10:28 AM
Conventions DGPhoney Up & Coming National GLOs 7 04-04-2002 05:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.