» GC Stats |
Members: 329,773
Threads: 115,673
Posts: 2,205,414
|
Welcome to our newest member, mammon |
|
 |

06-11-2008, 09:51 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: on GreekChat, duh.
Posts: 679
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
I believe in helping people too. I just don't think it should be at the end of a spear. Individuals and private entities are much, much, much more capable of discerning who is truly in need and who isn't. The government has a trail of horribly run social programs.
If freedom stops when we become irresponsible...what about abortion? Further, what good is freedom when it halts when times get tough? Individuals have a responsibility to look after the welfare of fellow citizens. The government doesn't have the responsibility of making everyone middle class.
|
What does abortion have to do with anything? And why must being a good neighbor and wanting to help people be "making everyone the middle class"? My point is that this trickle-down crap doesn't work. It should, in theory, but corporate greed often takes over. That's why the Republicans blocked an effort to tax the windfall profits of oil companies, yes? They know that the companies will only pass their tax bill onto consumers, thereby not really accomplishing anything for Joe and Jane Q. Consumer. That's the way the rest of corporate America works as well.
And what of freedom stopping when times get tough? That doesn't just happen economically, you know. My civil freedoms have been infringed upon by this lawless administration, yet I don't see you getting in a tissy about that one.
The way you phrase your answer makes me think you believe anyone who wants to tax wants to give money away and wants to live in a socialist government. I don't. I want to tax, but I want us to be wise about how we spend it. I don't think having some money put away for disasters is wanting to "make everyone middle class", or wanting to fund the military ( I would give the world to these people-- I live among them, and they deserve every blessing in this world for what they do every day) is making everyone middle class. I have a few ideas of my own as to what kind of programs need to be funded, but I think you'd be surprised at what is and what is not on that list.
__________________
|

06-11-2008, 12:38 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scbelle
What does abortion have to do with anything? And why must being a good neighbor and wanting to help people be "making everyone the middle class"? My point is that this trickle-down crap doesn't work. It should, in theory, but corporate greed often takes over. That's why the Republicans blocked an effort to tax the windfall profits of oil companies, yes? They know that the companies will only pass their tax bill onto consumers, thereby not really accomplishing anything for Joe and Jane Q. Consumer. That's the way the rest of corporate America works as well.
And what of freedom stopping when times get tough? That doesn't just happen economically, you know. My civil freedoms have been infringed upon by this lawless administration, yet I don't see you getting in a tissy about that one.
The way you phrase your answer makes me think you believe anyone who wants to tax wants to give money away and wants to live in a socialist government. I don't. I want to tax, but I want us to be wise about how we spend it. I don't think having some money put away for disasters is wanting to "make everyone middle class", or wanting to fund the military ( I would give the world to these people-- I live among them, and they deserve every blessing in this world for what they do every day) is making everyone middle class. I have a few ideas of my own as to what kind of programs need to be funded, but I think you'd be surprised at what is and what is not on that list.
|
I brought up abortion because you said freedom might extend only to the point where irresponsibility takes over. Well, considering that 9/10 abortions in this country are birth control decisions, I'd say we're facing an irresponsibility crisis in that regard. Thus, I see no reason why would shouldn't abrogate this "freedom" to put a halt to it.
Being a good neighbor has nothing to do with making others middle class. It also has nothing to do with massive governmental taxation and intervention. If you want to be a good neighbor, I don't think anyone is stopping you. If you want to go find 10 underprivileged people and purchase them healthcare, go right ahead. I salute you in your efforts to help fellow Americans. My problem is when you think others should be forced to do the same.
The Republicans blocked the windfall profits tax because it is the biggest load of $%&@ we've encountered recently. Even NPR noted that this was 99% political posturing. It is a blatant attempt by Democrats to blame this energy crisis on the industry, thus garnering political points by inciting class dispute. It is pure dog crap, and every elected Democrat knows it.
What freedoms of yours were infringed by this "lawless" administration? Please provide a list of YOUR civil rights which were violated by the Bush administration. Also, even if your charges are true, how is this a sound argument? Someone violated your civil rights, so we should extend that lawlessness as far as possible? Give me a break.
I absolutely agree that taxation is necessary. My problem is with the rate of taxation and who receives the benefit of that taxation. I'm not a diehard libertarian who thinks I should get to decide how every dollar is spent, but I do believe the government has done a piss-poor job with entitlement programs, and the idea of increased social welfare is bound for failure. There are things the government absolutely should provide for, like the common defense. It is the absurd extension of "general welfare" that I'm concerned with. It not only strips away the autonomy of citizens to determine who they wish to be charitable to, it also engenders subordination and personal irresponsibility. Further, it strips individuals of the responsibility they have to take care of their fellow Americans. That responsibility entails not only generosity, but also requires them to monitor how their resources are being managed by the recipient. This is the aspect of welfare at which the government so blatantly fails.
|

06-11-2008, 12:41 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater New York
Posts: 4,537
|
|
Just because you disagree with something doesn't make it irresponsible.
Abortions aren't wrong just because some slack jawed "pastor" says so.
Increasing the human population in the name of your "god" is irresponsible.
__________________
Love Conquers All
|

06-11-2008, 12:53 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RU OX Alum
Just because you disagree with something doesn't make it irresponsible.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RU OX Alum
Increasing the human population in the name of your "god" is irresponsible.
|
What? Seems like a bit of a contradiction.
|

06-11-2008, 01:03 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RU OX Alum
Just because you disagree with something doesn't make it irresponsible.
Abortions aren't wrong just because some slack jawed "pastor" says so.
Increasing the human population in the name of your "god" is irresponsible.
|
Thanks for the stunningly brilliant analysis.
Irresponsibility will always be subjective. I was responding to an assertion that freedom should sometimes yield when conduct becomes irresponsible, and presenting the possibility of a double standard.
|

06-11-2008, 01:33 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater New York
Posts: 4,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Thanks for the stunningly brilliant analysis.
Irresponsibility will always be subjective.
|
that was point, thanks for playing along
So should laws be subjective?
__________________
Love Conquers All
|

06-11-2008, 02:07 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RU OX Alum
that was point, thanks for playing along
So should laws be subjective?
|
All laws are subjective, and because I believe in a society with laws, my answer is yes.
|

06-11-2008, 02:15 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater New York
Posts: 4,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
All laws are subjective, and because I believe in a society with laws, my answer is yes.
|
So, if the law were reversed, and abortions were required in 9 out of 10 cases, would you still believe that? Or only this time because you agree with the subjectivity of the subject law?
__________________
Love Conquers All
|

06-13-2008, 05:33 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 16,133
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RU OX Alum
Abortions aren't wrong just because some slack jawed "pastor" says so.
|
lol lol lol
__________________
Phi Sigma Biological Sciences Honor Society “Daisies that bring you joy are better than roses that bring you sorrow. If I had my life to live over, I'd pick more Daisies!”
|
 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|