GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 332,725
Threads: 115,736
Posts: 2,208,345
Welcome to our newest member, logatopz4737
» Online Users: 2,424
0 members and 2,424 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2008, 06:38 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by EE-BO View Post
MysticCat- you are not being a bigot at all, just telling it like it is. I won't repeat my Mormon rant here from the other Romney thread of a few weeks ago, but if you really get into the texts and beliefs it is some way out there stuff.

The best evidence of the dangers of this cult are how guys like Jeffords can run entire towns in Utah of child molesting polygamists and nothing gets done until the federal government takes action.

Most major religious groups do their part to distance themselves from the fanatics among them and do not shield them when they break the law.

Not so with the Mormon Church which for all practical purposes runs state and local government. And I think that says it all. The sin of omission is just as bad as being a participant.
Aren't you failing to discriminate between one corrupt offshoot unrecognized (and I think excommunicated) by the mainstream church and the mainstream LDS Church itself?

I think it's a big reach to say that the LDS for practical purposes runs the state and local government. When I was in Salt Lake City a couple years ago, they had a big Gay Pride parade and festival within a block of Temple Square. I'm not thinking the LDS was a sponsor.

No doubt, the Mormon church is influential, but I'm not exactly sure what you expected them to do about the Jeffords.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2008, 08:23 PM
AOII_LB93 AOII_LB93 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
Aren't you failing to discriminate between one corrupt offshoot unrecognized (and I think excommunicated) by the mainstream church and the mainstream LDS Church itself?

No doubt, the Mormon church is influential, but I'm not exactly sure what you expected them to do about the Jeffords.
Do you guys mean Warren Jeffs?
This is a valid point. The group to which Jeffs was supposedly the "prophet", is the Fundamentalist Church of LDS...who were excommunicated by the "real" Mormon church, and it mainly had to do with the plural marriage aspect - which was generally banned by the "real" Mormons in 1890. Since 1904 (officially) those entering in to polygamous marriages are excommunicated. Large polygamist groups still exist, even in the SLC area, however they are not as numerous as people think. There are other divergences in belief, however the polygamy aspect is the largest of them.

Anyhow, enough of a sidebar...back to the topic.

Shinerbock, and EE-BO you both had very well written points. I'd say more about the original posting, you both have said what I thought to begin with anyhow.
__________________
Adam and Eve were lucky, neither had a mother-in-law.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2008, 09:12 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by AOII_LB93 View Post
Do you guys mean Warren Jeffs?
This is a valid point. The group to which Jeffs was supposedly the "prophet", is the Fundamentalist Church of LDS...who were excommunicated by the "real" Mormon church, and it mainly had to do with the plural marriage aspect - which was generally banned by the "real" Mormons in 1890. Since 1904 (officially) those entering in to polygamous marriages are excommunicated. Large polygamist groups still exist, even in the SLC area, however they are not as numerous as people think. There are other divergences in belief, however the polygamy aspect is the largest of them.

Anyhow, enough of a sidebar...back to the topic.

Shinerbock, and EE-BO you both had very well written points. I'd say more about the original posting, you both have said what I thought to begin with anyhow.
I think so; your description matches up with who I had in mind. I didn't look up the name; I just went with what was there from EE-BO. Maybe he meant someone else. If so, I apologize for jumping the gun.

Last edited by UGAalum94; 02-14-2008 at 09:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2008, 12:35 AM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,860
I heard on the radio today that Romney will be endorsing McCain
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2008, 01:06 AM
Thetagirl218 Thetagirl218 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,622
Yep! He endorsed McCain! I think it is rather sad when someone who fought against someone on so many key issues is now kissing their butt!!!

How many times did Romney and McCain have the Consverative arugement? And now he is just endorsing him because it is good for the party. It makes me want to go Independent.
__________________
"A Kappa Alpha Theta isn't something you become, its something you've always been!"


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2008, 04:37 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thetagirl218 View Post
Yep! He endorsed McCain! I think it is rather sad when someone who fought against someone on so many key issues is now kissing their butt!!!

How many times did Romney and McCain have the Consverative arugement? And now he is just endorsing him because it is good for the party. It makes me want to go Independent.
I know what you are saying, and yet, what are his options really?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-18-2008, 10:52 AM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
I know what you are saying, and yet, what are his options really?
There's an interesting take on it in the Washington Post today: Why Being the GOP's No. 2 Isn't So Bad.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mitt Romney is officially in shinerbock News & Politics 42 02-15-2007 07:31 PM
OH LAWD! Throwin' bows or maybe not... preciousjeni Greek Life 21 04-04-2004 12:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.