1 Killed in Shootings at Virginia Tech

[texas*princess]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

[1908Revelations]

yeah that's what I was talking about

[Senusret I]

I really don't think they need to be showing clips from this video on tv.

[macallan25]

Why is that?

[shinerbock]

If only we could rewind 3 days so somebody could have killed that piece of sh*t.

[Buttonz]

Originally Posted by shinerbock

If only we could rewind 3 days so somebody could have killed that piece of sh*t.

Agreed. I'm in shock from the videos and stuff that was sent to NBC

[hazelle]

now they are wondering about Cho's parents....the hatred for him...if they are safe...rumors were that they had committed suicide...now supposedly they are in a hospital with possible breakdowns...

these videos are so disturbing..seems like 9/11, the media just has to keep giving us more and more to upset us...it is coverage of a huge news event but there should be a limit...just read a psychological specialist state that we all are drawn to this for personal survival...so maybe that is why they keep reporting but when is enough, enough??

[UGAalum94]

I haven't read the whole thread because I was sort of trying to shut most of the story out.

I want to ask though if anyone else thinks that the kind of media attention that mass shootings get actually contribute to future ones?

With the apparent references to the Columbine killers as "martyrs," it seems that the Virginia Tech killer has that in mind as a precedent.

I get a sense that crazy guys like this want to top the previous killings and the 100% news saturation contributes to this obsession, I think.

It's not that I want to externally limit the freedom of the press, but it seems that more self regulation might be in order to avoid sensationalizing the already horrific.

Perhaps if stories were limited to print media without video or picture links, maybe.

I don't think we really need to know what it looked like. We don't need to see the carnage. We should be able to emphasize with the dead and suffering without images of them.

I think the killers are completely responsible for their actions, and I'm not shifting responsibility to the media. But if we know that a certain kind of coverage seems to feed the monsters' disease, what compelling reason is there to cover the story in the same manner that may have feed the current case?

(The monster in this case incorporated the media into his killing spree. He mailed the tape between the two shooting locations. Shouldn't we learn from that? Maybe that the constant coverage is indecent?)

[Buttonz]

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga

I get a sense that crazy guys like this want to top the previous killings and the 100% news saturation contributes to this obsession, I think.

I forget what channel I was watching, but someone mentioned this. The way the media keeps on referring to this as the "biggest shooting in history" is gonna make some nut job want to try to top it.

[AlexMack]

Originally Posted by shinerbock

If only we could rewind 3 days so somebody could have killed that piece of sh*t.

I don't agree. If only we could rewind 3 days and get him firmly committed into a mental institution for treatment.

Did anyone else think he sounded like a psychopathic napoleon dynamite? This is an appalling tragedy, but I'll take the minute amount of humour where I can get it.

[shinerbock]

Originally Posted by centaur532

I don't agree. If only we could rewind 3 days and get him firmly committed into a mental institution for treatment.

Did anyone else think he sounded like a psychopathic napoleon dynamite? This is an appalling tragedy, but I'll take the minute amount of humour where I can get it.

Anything that would have prevented this. I wouldn't prefer death over life, but I certainly wouldn't care if someone had killed him.