Guys,
Of course you guys can pick anyone you want to give membership to. Of course you guys use your own standards for what you are looking for in members.
It is probably true that the majority of Black students at your campuses don't fit the mold you describe.
I'm realizing more and more that you are right that if your attitudes in real life come across as clearly as they do here that the top notch Black guys by your own standards probably don't want to join your groups.
My point remains though that your policies end up being racist. That bothers me, and I'd want to change it. Of course it may not bother you.
I think to really integrate the NPC/IFC system, the top tiers need to buy in. It seems like a great opportunity to take a clearly correct, moral action.
When you look back on the stuggle to integrate the southern universities we're talking about, do you find yourself sympathizing with the George Wallaces, Lester Maddoxs, Orval Faubus? Because it seems to me that that is the historic side your on. Sure they were faced with a lot of people who wanted integration, and you would have to do it yourself based on the idea that it was the morally right thing to do.
It also probably doesn't seem as important to anyone else that you exclude Blacks, but it should seem, I think, important to everyone who participates in a segregated system.
I can't make you do anything. I know that, but it seems to me based on what little I know about fraternities, that the idea isn't only to have a social club for a certain kind of guy. It's to assemble the absolute best guys for the strength of the group so that they can have a social club AND carry out the ideals of the group. In many cases, it seems that the goals of the group involve leadership and service in the outside community.
When a group or a system conducts itself in such a way that it looks bad to the outside world, it weakens its influence outside the group or system.
Last edited by UGAalum94; 11-18-2006 at 05:32 PM.
Reason: extra apostrophe
|