|
» GC Stats |
Members: 333,223
Threads: 115,745
Posts: 2,208,533
|
| Welcome to our newest member, no_parking |
|
 |

11-17-2006, 05:56 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
|
|
I just find this very interesting.
Although it may not be accepted by all, would the RULES of LXA allow for a homosexual brothers "husband" or S.O. to wear a pin?
What would be acceptable in a homosexual relationship to allow a S.O, etc., to show the world that he is in a relationship with a LXA?
Obviously it is ok for a wife or girlfriend to display their association, what could a homosexual partner of a brother do?
|

11-17-2006, 06:32 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,586
|
|
|
Nothing, it is not in the rules of LXA as I understand them.
If I am wrong then someone please explain them to me.
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|

11-17-2006, 11:43 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 344
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GammaZeta
I just find this very interesting.
Although it may not be accepted by all, would the RULES of LXA allow for a homosexual brothers "husband" or S.O. to wear a pin?
What would be acceptable in a homosexual relationship to allow a S.O, etc., to show the world that he is in a relationship with a LXA?
Obviously it is ok for a wife or girlfriend to display their association, what could a homosexual partner of a brother do?
|
Did you not just read everthing that has been posted above? I believe that all of your questions have been answered quite clearly. Stop trying to stir up something. I sure there are more important things people in relationships straight or gay have to deal with, I doubt wearing a badge is one of them.
__________________
LCA
ZE 660
"True Brother" since 1998
|

11-18-2006, 12:41 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
|
|
Well Honky, I find it amazing that you doubt "wearing a badge" is important.
To me, it is. And I will ask any question I want on any topic I want if I want further clarification.
|

11-18-2006, 01:28 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tustin, California
Posts: 825
|
|
|
Same gender couples
I believe that same gender couples were not contemplated when our governing documents were written in 1909. They've been amended since but more in form than substance.
Although we would know immediately that a woman wearing a badge was not an initiate, a same gender partner of a Brother would give rise to some ambiguity. Years ago presenting a spouse / mother with a badge was a stylish thing to do. I like the idea, but I've not seen it out here on the west coast - still a practice or a quaint out of practice custom?
I don't profess to know the answer, but I can see questions. I have been to LXA functions where a Brother brought his partner and I was confused at first because I thought that the guest was one of us!
The Committee on Emblems and Ritual may want to visit this topic at General Assembly in 2007. The badge police aren't gonna catch anybody in the mean time but this may be an appropriate topic for exploration for future deliberations.
|

11-18-2006, 09:39 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
|
|
Good idea John. Traditionally a pin has been used for females, what would everyone think of the idea of using something different, like a symbol instead of letters so that A. another male could wear something that represents his involvement with a LXA and B. it is not confused with a brother wearing letters.
|

11-18-2006, 10:00 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 580
|
|
|
John,
I'd note that in 1909 our fraternity would have banned jewish and african american men from joining too.
Also I didn't notice the difference between fiance and fiancee, but Jono you're right.
I think at this point this thread has been answered and probably should be closed before it gets out of control.
|

11-18-2006, 10:46 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
|
|
Maybe we should start a new thread addressing homosexuality within our fraternity and how we, as brothers, can better embrace it.
Like Em1843 said, at one time our fraternity did not allow african american or jewish men.
I think an open and frank dialogue will be helpful in starting to embrace and accept different lifestyles of brothers.
|

11-18-2006, 02:50 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tustin, California
Posts: 825
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EM1843
John,
I'd note that in 1909 our fraternity would have banned jewish and african american men from joining too.
Also I didn't notice the difference between fiance and fiancee, but Jono you're right.
I think at this point this thread has been answered and probably should be closed before it gets out of control.
|
Whoops - you're absolutely right. I'm ashamed for forgetting about that - I know it was an issue, and a major one at that, when those changes were made, but they absolutely slipped my mind.
That's what I get for making entries just before going to bed or while sipping coffee at Starbucks.
|

11-19-2006, 06:28 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 344
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EM1843
John,
I'd note that in 1909 our fraternity would have banned jewish and african american men from joining too.
Also I didn't notice the difference between fiance and fiancee, but Jono you're right.
I think at this point this thread has been answered and probably should be closed before it gets out of control.
|
I would agree!!
__________________
LCA
ZE 660
"True Brother" since 1998
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|