Is Gay marriage necessary today or immoral?

[dzdst796]

IMO there are other pressing issues facing us. As far as gay unions/marriages what is the big damn deal? Who and how people choose to love is nobody's business. I know people that have had a more successful same sex relationship than people I know who have a heterosexual relationship. I do feel that if two people share their lives together that they should be allowed to share in the same benefits whether or not they are a homosexual couple or heterosexual.

[mccoyred]

Originally Posted by dzdst796

IMO there are other pressing issues facing us. As far as gay unions/marriages what is the big damn deal? Who and how people choose to love is nobody's business. I know people that have had a more successful same sex relationship than people I know who have a heterosexual relationship. I do feel that if two people share their lives together that they should be allowed to share in the same benefits whether or not they are a homosexual couple or heterosexual.

Thank you, and good night!

[PerroLoco]

Originally Posted by mccoyred

Thank you, and good night!

Why so?

Its been proven and voted on by the general populace in 38 of 50 states that marriage is an institution between a man and a woman, with it only failing in one state.

No one is telling people that they can't love each other or have a relationship. Why is "gay marriage" a pressing issue? The public is tired of special interests forcing agendas down their throats. These items are of importance as a ballot measure because no state wants to be forced to recognize a statute in Massachussetts that the majority of the individuals in that state disagrees with.

Its not about denying anyone their rights or happiness. For many Americans, "marriage" is a sacrament, not just a legal contract binding a couple of any sex to certain fiduciary and legal obligations. "Holy Matrimony" is ordained by God and is consecrated in His presence. Since God Himself calls homosexuality an "abomination", it is not something that can be blessed, joined by him, or considered Holy. Therefore, same sex unions cannot be considered "marriage".

However, since America is a constitutional republic, all citizens have the right to equal protection and fair treatment and therefore gay/lesbian couples should have all rights granted to those in a traditional marriage by way of Civil Unions, which addresses the needs of the legal constructs of marriage.

[dzdst796]

OK. I think the stressing about what to call it "Marriage or Civil Union" is ridiculous. As long as it is a union that is considered valid and that the benefits can be shared between both people, regardless of gender that is the important factor in all of this.

Heterosexuals should not be offended by it being called a "Marriage" and homosexuals need to be glad that they will be able to reap the benefits of their union being legal.

And lets not start the conversation about "God" and how He feels about it. God feels a certain way about everything and we as people don't heed to it so this issue shouldn't be held to a higher standard than anything else.

[PerroLoco]

Originally Posted by dzdst796

OK. I think the stressing about what to call it "Marriage or Civil Union" is ridiculous. As long as it is a union that is considered valid and that the benefits can be shared between both people, regardless of gender that is the important factor in all of this.

Heterosexuals should not be offended by it being called a "Marriage" and homosexuals need to be glad that they will be able to reap the benefits of their union being legal.

And lets not start the conversation about "God" and how He feels about it. God feels a certain way about everything and we as people don't heed to it so this issue shouldn't be held to a higher standard than anything else.

Its "ridiculous" only if you have no benchmarks. If your standards for marriage mean a "husband and wife", then what its call is meaningful. The problem with secular humanism is its absence of standands and moral equivalency which leads to a watering down and lack of respect for ideals that require man to rise to a higher level rather than sinking to the lowest common denominator which you advocate with your "who cares" position. That attitude and its subsequent lifestyle choices are the root of many of the pathologies which ails our communities and is the basis for our apathetic and apologetic stance on sources of behavior which destroys families.

[Dionysus]

Originally Posted by PerroLoco

Its "ridiculous" only if you have no benchmarks. If your standards for marriage mean a "husband and wife", then what its call is meaningful. The problem with secular humanism is its absence of standands and moral equivalency which leads to a watering down and lack of respect for ideals that require man to rise to a higher level rather than sinking to the lowest common denominator which you advocate with your "who cares" position. That attitude and its subsequent lifestyle choices are the root of many of the pathologies which ails our communities and is the basis for our apathetic and apologetic stance on sources of behavior which destroys families.

[BrooklynCutie]

"If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." John 8:7

What makes your sins any better than anyone else you claim to have sinned?

For those against gay marriages, you should worry about your own relationship with God and not anyone elses.

[mulattogyrl]

Originally Posted by dzdst796

IMO there are other pressing issues facing us. As far as gay unions/marriages what is the big damn deal? Who and how people choose to love is nobody's business. I know people that have had a more successful same sex relationship than people I know who have a heterosexual relationship. I do feel that if two people share their lives together that they should be allowed to share in the same benefits whether or not they are a homosexual couple or heterosexual.

that's my prophyte dammit