Your thoughts on AI: discussion goes here.

[midwesterngirl]

I just think that keeping the forum alive allows a level of presumption that many sorority's may not want. I think it has created a sense of entitlement that I personally find rude,arrogant and disrespectful to the organizations in question.Who are you to tell me or my sisters,some of whom are national officers, that you are entitled to something that my organization doesn't make public? Why would I want someone in my organization who is so arrogant that they feel that this is their right to know just to satisfy themselves? Not to mention
that I think it is incrediably lazy to come to a message board to look for your information. It takes the same amount of time to email a introductory letter to a sorority's HQ as it does to email the same letter to GCer. If you can't even take even the most minute initiative,what kind of asset are you going to be when it comes down to it? It is fine if you don't know but if you want something directly why would you ask GC and not the HQ's? If you want something from the horses mouth, you need to ask the horse, so to speak.

It has been said several times before that a few years ago many sorority's contained public information about AI. Now for the most part they do not. It is on the sister's only side or it isn't there at all. How does that not suggest that it isn't information the organizations want public? If they wanted it public they would make it public. It is that simple. Without the hair splitting that has been going on on both sides of this argument, it is that simple. I don't see any gray to this area at all.