GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 334,358
Threads: 115,803
Posts: 2,209,945
Welcome to our newest member, maisonpetrovoz4
» Online Users: 4,788
1 members and 4,787 guests
JayhawkAOII
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2006, 10:35 AM
mulattogyrl mulattogyrl is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 4,424
Send a message via AIM to mulattogyrl Send a message via Yahoo to mulattogyrl
Quote:
Originally Posted by RACooper View Post
Ah yes because I forgot, the easy explanation that any violence commited by one of the Islamic faith can be attributed to a “Jihad”

There is a serious double-standard, or dare I say prejudice, out there that _Opi_ was trying to draw attention to (I think) – namely how the violence is portrayed or reported differently as it applies to Muslims.

Looking at the recent news, concerning the Amish school shooting, how much has been made of the murderer’s faith? I haven’t seen headlines proclaiming “Christian Man murders Amish children”, have you? But lets just say that the shooter had been Muslim… do you think the reporting might have mentioned his faith then? Or say the shooting at Dawson College up in Montreal… if the shooter had been a Muslim instead of a Atheist/Nihilist, I’m positive that the coverage would have been vastly different.

The problem is that many (yourself included) seem to jump to the conclusion that in the case of a Muslim committing a violent act, the first conclusion (and only amongst some) is it is simply “a further example of the violent nature of the faith”… whereas the same acts committed by a Christian will instead focus on how the perpetrator was deranged or “sick”, not their faith. Now why is that? Is this simply a new flavour of societal prejudice, much like the double standard of racial labelling in crime reporting of the past (and present in some areas)?

Finally why is it that every time a Muslim commits an unspeakable act, that other Muslims are called to justify or defend their faith? <such as you did with _Opi_ in another thread> Yet the same standard isn’t applied for us Christians – for example, I haven’t be asked to defend the Christian (or Roman Catholic denomination) faith in light of the Christian militants actions in Indonesia… nor do I think were Christians held accountable for the actions of Hitler – after all he was “Christian”. Instead we recognize that these acts, individuals, and ideologies are aberrations or perversions of the Christian faith – so why can’t we apply the same reasoning and standards to Islam?

You summed it all up. Thank you.
__________________
Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.

It's a jungle out there.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
assessing potential terrorists Senlable News & Politics 1 01-04-2006 05:58 PM
GLOs at Abilene Christian don't "reflect Christian values" hoosier Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 3 10-14-2005 09:33 AM
The Bush Admin let known terrorists into the country? IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 7 09-08-2004 04:18 PM
the random hijack chain smiley21 Chit Chat 31 06-30-2003 11:50 PM
Giving the terrorists ideas AOPiLaLa News & Politics 11 11-02-2001 02:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.