The Problem with Autism Speaks

[WhiteRose1912]

Originally Posted by Kevin

I don't really have a problem with that approach. If they can do research to prevent children from developing autism, power to 'em.

Autistic people generally don't like to be further stigmatized. And our world would be a worse place without autism. Temple Grandin immediately comes to mind.

Originally Posted by Griffins&Quills

As general members, it's not really our choice. Nationals decided and announced the partnership with Autism Speaks in 2009. Before that, our philanthropy was Choose Children which allowed chapters to individually pick organizations to support.

I know this. I was a collegian when the announcement was made and I was saddened that I could no longer support our local chapter's philanthropic efforts.

Originally Posted by Griffins&Quills

ETA: There are controversies (as you say) with a lot of organizations (Susan G Komen, UNICEF, etc) where only a small amount of donations actually goes towards the cause and the CEOs are making a $500,000 a year salary

Originally Posted by WestcoastWonder

Ugh, this reminds me of the whole Susan G. Komen/Breast Cancer Awareness situation. I support all legitimate, reputable charities and non-profit orgs, but I don't like how only around 20% of the millions raised goes to breast cancer research..

I haven't donated a dime to Susan G. Komen since the Planned Parenthood fiasco.

I have no idea what percentage of AS's budget goes to research and what percentage goes to administration. I do know they've sunk millions into trying to prove that there was a link with vaccines to no avail (and compromising our herd immunity in the process). My concern is that only 4% goes to helping families learning to embrace autism or helping autistic individuals. Y'know... actual autistic people who need help.