|
Oh good points KSUViolet06 and many thank for digging up that thread.
"More women are coming in as sophs and juniors from close-to-home CCs (where they stayed for the first 2 years to save money.)"
- So would this mean the non-freshman stigma at the big super competitive schools diminish. I know at USC sophomore and even junior transfers are not necessarily an automatic cut from recruitment.
"Or, more women who would have gone out of state are staying home and going to UF, UA, etc."
"If anything, aren't there MORE PNMs now at some of the big Southern flagships (because of the "stay home and go to UA to save money" factor?)"
- True that, but with the analysis of the bid lists from Bama and Auburn last fall, if anything there were more PNMs from out-of-state than ever before? Confusing. Or is it that PNM from out-of-state may perhaps have more disposable income, or the benefits of finding a community to thrive in a new place is worth it?
I guess what I was really trying to get at is if recruitment at those schools will significantly change/be affected. Not to belittle no-frills recruitment; but I can't help but assume that full-frills recruitment has an inherent higher cost to the chapters in general. And by extension at these schools recruitment registration fees tend to be much higher than average.
|
Threaded Mode
