GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,776
Threads: 115,673
Posts: 2,205,428
Welcome to our newest member, Michaelgom
» Online Users: 3,661
3 members and 3,658 guests
3DGator, amIblue?, KatieKate1244
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old 06-27-2011, 01:13 PM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluPhire View Post
Umm that is the point. That is the state's perogative. The state feels it is in its best interest to say "Hey, you religious guy do marriage, make sure they get the paperwork in order and we will recognize that you married them."

Nothing to do with we being embedded with religion, but more so of the state just passing the buck. The proof is in the ability of having a legal marriage outside of religion. If it was the only way to have your marriage recognized is through a religious ceremony then I would agree 100% with you, but there are, have, and always be other options outside of religion.
Your logic does not resemble our earth logic.

It's really not that hard:

1) For a variety of historical reasons, American states have chosen to allow clergy to act as agents of the state for the purpose of solemnizing marriage. No state has limited solemnization of marriage to the clergy, but all states have authorized the clergy to act as their agents in this regard.

2) Because of this historic arrangement, Americans in general do not see a clear difference between marriage in the legal/civil sense and marriage in the religious sense.

I never said that religion is "embedded" or "in bed with" religion. Those are your words. Nor did I ever suggest that religion or the clergy control marriage in this country. What I said was that "civil marriage and religious marriage are intertwined and entangled in our current system." That's a very different thing.

Because we do not have a clear distinction between civil and religious marriage, then any discussion of "marriage" is likely to pull in and refer to both, without regard to how they may be different. And it provokes arguments about whether if same-sex marriages are legalized, clergy can be required to perform them against their consciences, or whether, say, churches can be held liable for refusing to let their facilities be used for them. In a country where there is a clear distinction between marriage in the civil/legal sense and marriage in the religious sense, such questions aren't nearly as likely to arise.


ETA: What KSig RC said.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898

Last edited by MysticCat; 06-27-2011 at 01:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Memphis Chartering Approved! LXAMEMPHIS Lambda Chi Alpha 3 07-21-2005 04:11 PM
New York moving along the marriage path IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 9 02-05-2005 12:07 PM
Abraham Lincoln was a gay republican who approved of same-sex marriage IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 13 12-22-2004 07:47 PM
Same-sex marriage ban fails in Senate Lil' Hannah News & Politics 39 07-16-2004 08:53 AM
Brown approved by Senate panel D.COM Delta Sigma Theta 0 11-07-2003 09:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.