Quote:
Originally Posted by oldu
I don't mean to split hairs but many Greek organizations allow special initiations of people beyond college age and they probably should not be called "honorary." My conception of that term is someone who is not really a member but deserve the title because of the respect the organization has for them.
|
Well, we have to go with the terminology that the organizations use. I can see how that might be your conception of honorary, but many organizations seem to feel differently. Whether those initiated after college should be called "honorary" or not, the fact is they often are. My fraternity's constitution, for example, provides for four classes of membership: probationary (pledge), collegiate, alumnus and honorary.
A chapter can (with appropriate approval) initiate a chapter honorary and our National Executive Committee can at convention initiate a national honorary (Chapter designation: Alpha Alpha). The only differences between an honorary member and a collegiate or alumnus member is that the honorary member did not go through a probationary membership period and was not initiated while connected to an educational institution hosting a chapter. (Grad students and faculty/staff can be initiated as "collegiate" members and then transfer to alumnus status.) All honorary members
must be initiated, though.
I can see why one might want a different term or at least wish that all GLOs used the same or similar terminology, but that horse has left the barn.
I think, for purposes such as this, the issue is whether the fraternity in question claims the president in question as a member. If they do, I'm not sure it's my place to dispute that claim simply because, under similar circumstances (such as not undergoing initiation), my fraternity would not claim him as a member.
Threaded Mode
