Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
I think that's the very reason why no one has suggested doing anything at all with 100- or 500-year floodplains (and really, the reason why we label them as such) - it's unpredictable and sometimes will go completely apeshit. No one is saying to clear out the 500-year floodplain, just the areas that are consistently in danger and would be cost-effective to purchase.
At least from what I've seen and read, anyone who takes that tone is likely being disingenuous based on a preconceived agenda. The WV Representative that blamed this on Bush did so with absolutely no understanding of the situation.
I haven't heard a single person involved claim that governmental agencies did anything wrong, which is the most telling part. Unless further information comes to light, you have to simply think this was a once-in-500-years occurrence, and you can't plan for that sort of thing.
|
That's completely how I see it, but I'm still expecting spin to emerge that will allow people to advocate for whatever it is that they want to advocate for anyway.
As long as it remains a bad-stuff-even-happens-with-good-government story or a look-at-what-can-be-accomplished-with-relatively-minimal-federal-government-action story, there's not going to be a good agenda and story match-up for many media outlets or so says my little black media hating heart.
On a slightly different note, what's going to happen with the flooding hits the Mississippi outside of New Orleans. Is the river delta down there just so big we can assume it's going to be okay?
Threaded Mode
