Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleMcGuire1983
I know back in 2002 I could have walked away at any moment and said "screw this BS, I'm out." Quite a few guys did.
|
So, the natural question (at least to me) would be is hazing worth losing those guys who you at least thought were the kind of man you would like to call "brother."
When I look at our chapters (or any one elses) who pledge thirty guys and initiate fifteen, I think two things. First, that they probably haze and second, what a waste of time and resources to lose members of your pledge class that you've had to work hard to win.
It makes no sense to me.
But then, after being a alumni volunteer/officer, I can't condone hazing at all.
ETA, thinking of the title of this thread, it is kind of a stretch since, as has been pointed out, there weren't really "hazing laws" back then. If situations got bad enough, there could be prosecution under other laws, as has also been pointed out.
Threaded Mode
