You may feel the need to defend your "dawg" Soror, and that's fine. But it doesn't change my view one iota. (no pun intended). I understand that they may be a number of perpetrators in this forum. I know the people THINK the internet is anonmyous and that they can falsely claim and organization as their own, but the problem I have is you can't base that on something as TRIVIAL, as not knowing what "OWT means.
And its still in poor taste to make that assumption on a message board after one post. I agree, if Doggy Style felt the need to "challenge" her, a PM would have surficed. But it STILL doesn't change the fact that someone in another organization cannot TRULY know whether someone is or isn't a Delta. ONLY our Sorors can KNOW that for certain. (and visa versa)
Yes, you can ask questions and investigate. You can always ASSUME, but I'm simply saying that jumping to conclusions on an admitted neophyte is being hasty at best, especially on a forum like this.
Now, I realize that every forum has its culture, and it seems that this one embraces the "Coleman Love" concept more or less. But, it is overstepping your bounds to make assumptions about others in another org based on minimal contact. This is much different than what you described (ie questioning, and follow-up notice to members of that particular org)
I'll just agree to disagree and leave it at that. I look forward to more lively debate with my Sorors and fellow greeks in the forum, (including Doggy Style).
And for the record, I'm not "jumping" on DoggyStyle, I'm just sharing my opinion as he shared his....I have no "beef" with him or anyone else
Threaded Mode