Sue Happy Lawyers

[Tom Earp]

First you sue Tobacco Companys for giving cancer.
Then, you sue Mc Donalds for making for making people fat.

So, when do you sue Budwieswer for making people being drunk screwing ugly people?

[kddani]

Perhaps we should sue the beer and liquor companies for causing people to make atrocious nonsensical posts on message boards.

[VandalSquirrel]

Originally Posted by kddani

Perhaps we should sue the beer and liquor companies for causing people to make atrocious nonsensical posts on message boards.

I thought moonshine was made in bathtub stills? Can you buy moonshine in liquor stores?

[MysticCat]

You do know, don't you Tom, that the lawyers can't sue these companies on their own? They have to have clients on whose behalf they are suing.

If the clients weren't there, the lawyers couldn't sue.

[macallan25]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

First you sue Tobacco Companys for giving cancer.
Then, you sue Mc Donalds for making for making people fat.

So, when do you sue Budwieswer for making people being drunk screwing ugly people?

I dunno, but I think they should sue nursing homes for letting past-their-prime senile Lambda Chis out of their wathcful eyes, enabling them to freely roam the streets in search of a computer that is able to access certain online message boards.

[valkyrie]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

You do know, don't you Tom, that the lawyers can't sue these companies on their own? They have to have clients on whose behalf they are suing.

If the clients weren't there, the lawyers couldn't sue.

Seriously. I don't understand the point of blaming lawyers, as if they file stupid lawsuits on their own.

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

First you sue Tobacco Companys for giving cancer.
Then, you sue Mc Donalds for making for making people fat.

So, when do you sue Budwieswer for making people being drunk screwing ugly people?

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

You do know, don't you Tom, that the lawyers can't sue these companies on their own? They have to have clients on whose behalf they are suing.

If the clients weren't there, the lawyers couldn't sue.

Exactly, and I've never quite understood why lawyers get so much of the blame here.

[TrueBlueKappa]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

First you sue Tobacco Companys for giving cancer.
Then, you sue Mc Donalds for making for making people fat.

So, when do you sue Budwieswer for making people being drunk screwing ugly people?

Because it's the lawyers' faults. Not their clients'.

[shinerbock]

I'll sue anybody. I mean anybody. Nuns, puppies, just wait till I pass the bar/graduate from law school/finish my first semester.

[valkyrie]

Originally Posted by shinerbock

I'll sue anybody. I mean anybody. Nuns, puppies, just wait till I pass the bar/graduate from law school/finish my first semester.

You could sue Tom Earp.

[Munchkin03]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

First you sue Tobacco Companys for giving cancer.
Then, you sue Mc Donalds for making for making people fat.

So, when do you sue Budwieswer for making people being drunk screwing ugly people?

Tom, what is the reason behind your attitude towards lawyers? Was your ex-wife one? Did she run away with one?

[GeekyPenguin]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

You do know, don't you Tom, that the lawyers can't sue these companies on their own? They have to have clients on whose behalf they are suing.

If the clients weren't there, the lawyers couldn't sue.

WHAT? You mean lawyers aren't just out to cause everyone problems?

*drops out of law school*

[AlexMack]

Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin

WHAT? You mean lawyers aren't just out to cause everyone problems?

*drops out of law school*

But what will Harvard do without you?

[GeekyPenguin]

Originally Posted by centaur532

But what will Harvard do without you?

Oh, I imagine they'll keep soldiering on.