GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,712
Threads: 115,665
Posts: 2,204,924
Welcome to our newest member, zmasonsasd826
» Online Users: 1,494
0 members and 1,494 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2005, 01:36 PM
moe.ron moe.ron is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southeast Asia
Posts: 9,026
Send a message via AIM to moe.ron
Long fight predicted on Gov. Baldacci's gay rights bill

Link to the Article

Quote:
A second bill, sponsored by Rep. Brian Duprey, R-Hampden, seeks to outlaw abortion if a child carries an as-yet undiscovered gene determining homosexuality.

"Most people would agree that to kill someone just because that person might be gay would constitute a hate crime," Duprey said, in a news release arguing some mothers would abort their fetuses if they carried the so-called "gay gene."
WTF???????
__________________
Spambot Killer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2005, 03:16 PM
IowaStatePhiPsi IowaStatePhiPsi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,624
heh. In the Iowa legislature there's a bill to add sexual orientation to the list of categories protected in public accomodation (public hospitals, schools, etc) and from discrimination in housing & employment. (bills can be found here)

This letter was in yesterday's Des Moines Register:

Quote:
No tax support for gay agenda

The Iowa Association of School Boards is correct in opposing state Senator Joe Bolkcom's Senate File 126 that would expand civil-rights protection to include sexual orientation. This legislation provides homosexual, bisexual and gender-modification activists access to the schoolhouse door.

State Senator Matt McCoy's Senate File 150 provides the actual key to unlock the door. McCoy's legislation would make state certification of a school district contingent upon inclusion of sexual orientation in district educational programs.

The debate is not about civil rights or bigotry. It is about legislation requiring schools to engage in sexual indoctrination at taxpayer expense. It does not make sense to divert school resources from academics to sexual orientation.
-Tim Ehrich,
Corydon.
...schools already engage in sexual indoctrination at taxpayer expense... every school I went to showed me videos and textbooks on heterosexuality.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2005, 04:04 PM
James James is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 8,594
Send a message via ICQ to James Send a message via AIM to James
Yes, but all the mainstream sex acts for heterosexuals save one apply to homosexuals also. Just use your imagination, and switch the genders around. If you can't extrapolate it . . . well it makes you wonder.

Quote:
Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
heh. In the Iowa legislature there's a bill to add sexual orientation to the list of categories protected in public accomodation (public hospitals, schools, etc) and from discrimination in housing & employment. (bills can be found here)

This letter was in yesterday's Des Moines Register:



...schools already engage in sexual indoctrination at taxpayer expense... every school I went to showed me videos and textbooks on heterosexuality.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.