Sac
Hey guys,
I am not sure if anyone else holds the same opinion, but at the last regional conclave I left the legislation review fairly disappointed. Yes, the legislation drawn up about the name change was clearly wrong. What really got to me was the fact that the legislation for a dues increase was proposed by SAC. I understand the need for the dues increase, and to frank I am in favor of it. What I am not in favor of is having the Student Advisory Committee that allegedly represents us proposes information that clearly was not brought about by them. The Grand High Zeta should have been the ones who proposed the legislation. I had talked to some guys who work with national who agreed, but thought, “the legislation would be taken better if t was from our representatives.” We are all brothers just propose the legislation as if anyone else would, and believe that we will treat it the same because you are a brother. I would also like to reiterate what another GC member had said about out the lack of Representation. Appointed members are not representative, that is why the US Senate was changed to direct election rather that representative appointment.
These are just my two cents. I am sorry if I stepped on any feet, but I felt it would be a good I idea to get the arguments out there.
In ZAX,
Joshua Stockstill
Phi Psi 517
|
Threaded Mode