Quote:
Originally Posted by SWTXBelle
Oh, I'm sure you are firmly convinced you are almost never wrong.
How very close minded to assume that someone who is legally guilty is, um, guilty. Why, that's ridiculous.
|
I think I've explained it at this point. If you don't get it, that's on you.
He's legally guilty for sure. Did he actually do it? A guilty plea to a suspended sentence when facing multiple decades behind bars if he took it to trial isn't going to convince me he actually did it. Especially when the mom has a huge financial motive to coach the kid to accuse her father of molesting her.
Quote:
|
I do appreciate you coming out and claiming that you have authoritatively deemed ALS incompetent - thank you for not subjecting us to any more weaselly "whether als was a terrible caseworker, I don't know" type subterfuge. Your open mindedness serves as an example to us all.
|
Frankly, anyone who still can't understand what I've been saying over and over has some serious reading comprehension issues. You haven't been there/done that. I have. Having successfully defended fathers accused of this very thing, from what is said in the article, it is difficult to tell whether it really happened.
I can tell you that a father molesting his own child is exceedingly rare. And that child being his first victim? Even more rare.
What's so hard to get? Even the prosecutor admitted that a conviction at trial wasn't a foregone conclusion. I suppose you know more about this case than the prosecutor?