Quote:
Originally Posted by dgdramadawg
I'm wondering what school this could possibly be because, as jesssigkap mentioned, 2.2 seems very low for SEC. Of course, adpiucf is absolutely right that taking a girl with the minimum is rare... why take a girl with the bare minimum when there are PNMs with much higher? OP, I'm not trying to guess where you're going; please don't think I'm asking you to tell us.
Here's what's available online for the SEC schools. It seems a lot of schools don't post an "official" required GPA. I wonder how this could hurt PNMs who don't know how much a low GPA could hurt them?
Alabama - none listed. Bama is known for having one of the most competitive recruitments, though, so even if a PNM can register with any GPA a low GPA would equal an early cut (although they don't list official chapter minimums on the site).
Arkansas - 2.5 required to participate.
Auburn - none listed. Site specifically states that PNMs with GPAs below a 3.0 will be unlikely to receive bids.
Florida - none listed, but UF has become very hard to get into... it would be rare to get into UF with a 2.5!
Georgia - none listed, but it's also very hard to get into UGA... it would be rare to get in with a 2.5 high school GPA.
Kentucky - no official GPA required to participate, but in recruitment info they list 2.8 as required for one house and 3.0 for all the others.
LSU - 2.75 required to participate.
Ole Miss - no official GPA required to participate, but in recruitment info they list chapter requirements between 2.6 and 3.0.
Miss State - 2.0 required for upperclassmen, nothing listed for underclassmen. Chapter GPAs are much higher.
South Carolina - none listed, but chapter GPAs are all very high (most above 3.3), so I can't imagine anyone taking a grade risk.
Tennessee - none listed, but FAQs mention that the average sorority member has a 3.1 GPA so it can be assumed that similar qualifications are expected from PNMs.
Vanderbilt - Deferred recruitment (no GPA listed), but I can't imagine someone with a 2.5 getting into Vandy.
|
Not that it matters, but DGDramaDawg, this post demonstrates among other reasons why you are one of my favorite GCers. No level of investigation is too much for an SEC rush thread.
ETA: I didn't mean anything in contrast to the Drolefille post. I'm not in favor of "outing" folks; since you listed them all, I never saw the problem. I agree that we shouldn't try to narrow it down any further than the PNM wants us too. She said SEC; you listed all the SEC.