Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
LOOOOOOOOOOOOL so the lack of breaks and lunches was fine, but *GASP* unbalanced scheduling is a problem?
|
I'm not really sure who came up with the "lack of breaks and lunches" thing (I know it was in the article, but they didn't go into further detail about it). If you're a floor rep, it's up to you to take your breaks and lunches, and at least at the store I worked for, it was abused, more then skipped. And if they are following company policy, everyone else (i.e. cashiers) is scheduled by the customer service manager for breaks and lunches, and shouldn't be missing them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
Although I generally think Wal-Mart is pretty reprehensible in a lot of ways, I have absolutely zero problem with this - what duty does Wal-Mart have to keep staff on a schedule that is wasteful?
Do you really think Wal-Mart will have trouble filling these positions if people can't work the 'optimized' hours?
This is nothing but intelligent business - I'm not sure predictable hours are 'deserved' by anyone.
|
I'm all for cutting overhead, and intelligent business and all that, but I do feel that employers have a responsibility to their employees to treat them decent. I believe this includes predictability in scheduling. There are times that something comes up in my schedule (dr. appointment, interview, etc) and I have to adjust my schedule, my husband's schedule, the babysitter's schedule and it's a nightmare. I couldn't imagine doing that every week, or heck, even every day. And at Wal-mart wages, I wouldn't be able to afford to keep a babysitter on call, that's for sure.