View Single Post
  #190  
Old 09-10-2006, 08:22 PM
Unregistered-
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tippiechick
I think it is very sisterly!

Let's say ABC's chapter at UF is one of ABC's most well-known chapters. Now, say that a legacy knew she probably would have a harder time getting in there at UF. Under your policy, she could take the easy way, go to a school where it's VERY easy to get into ABC. Then, after initiation, she could transfer to UF and become a member. Now, she has taken a slot that someone could have gotten that would help the original chapter build-up.

So, stronger chapters would stay strong while weaker chapters would possibly just get weaker as a result of losing sisters guaranteed a spot anywhere they wish to transfer.

Voting makes sense. Having a no-transfer policy also makes sense in these stronger chapters.

See, the people at the top make these decisions because they have thought all of this out.
It makes sense. Re-reading UCFAlumna's post about maintaining the integrity of the chapter, I don't see anything un-sisterly about it.

Are there other NPC chapters who have similar "no-transfers" rules?
Reply With Quote