GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   The Bush Admin let known terrorists into the country? (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=56588)

IowaStatePhiPsi 09-08-2004 01:43 AM

The Bush Admin let known terrorists into the country?
 
Just realized that Bush & Co. allowed Gaspar Jimenez Escobedo, Pedro Remon and Guillermo Novo into the US.

So much for fighting terrorists. :rolleyes:

Kevin 09-08-2004 08:02 AM

They attempted to assassinate Castro.

I think the President believes that killing Castro would not be a crime.

It wouldn't be a difficult thing to make a case supporting these guys as not being terrorists. They don't really fit the US model of what a terrorist is for one. They were trying to kill off an oppressive head of state. If someone were to attempt the same with Kim Jong Il, I'd support them in that as well.

But I forgot, praising Castro has become a liberal cause du jour.

PhiPsiRuss 09-08-2004 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ktsnake
But I forgot, praising Castro has become a liberal cause du jour.
My favorite was when Ed Asner defended Castro the day after his regime killed journalists.

IowaStatePhiPsi 09-08-2004 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ktsnake
They attempted to assassinate Castro.

I think the President believes that killing Castro would not be a crime.

It wouldn't be a difficult thing to make a case supporting these guys as not being terrorists. They don't really fit the US model of what a terrorist is for one. They were trying to kill off an oppressive head of state. If someone were to attempt the same with Kim Jong Il, I'd support them in that as well.

So the definition of terrorist is dependent on US Foreign Policy? Wow- this makes the Bush Regime even more fucked up. Thanx for proving my point.

Kevin 09-08-2004 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
So the definition of terrorist is dependent on US Foreign Policy? Wow- this makes the Bush Regime even more fucked up. Thanx for proving my point.
No, terrorists target innocent people to get their messages across through terror -- the operative word being terror.

In this case, the target was Fidel Castro, a far from innocent man. He's a murderer and a brutal dictator. If these men had been successful, the world would have been left a better place.

Are you saying that Fidel is a good leader for Cuba, someone that should be respected and admired because of his fight for the worker's paradise of Cuba?

Fidel is a bad man, and karma is a bitch.

DeltAlum 09-08-2004 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ktsnake
No, terrorists target innocent people to get their messages across through terror -- the operative word being terror.

This is true. Although Castro will die on his own before too long.

To accuse the Bush Administration of allowing known terrorists into the country is really grasping.

It would be wonderful if both sides would cut this crap out.

DeltAlum 09-08-2004 04:06 PM

Just as I don't think there any merit to accusing the administration in this case, nor is there reason to attack the Democrats.

Rudey 09-08-2004 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DeltAlum
Just as I don't think there any merit to accusing the administration in this case, nor is there reason to attack the Democrats.
Of course not. My point was just that. The creator of this thread only had one thing in mind in creating this thread and I can do what he can, but better.

-Rudey


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.