GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   New SCOTUS nominee (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=113483)

Elephant Walk 05-10-2010 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AOII Angel (Post 1927081)
Ha, you couldn't be farther from the truth. I'm pretty laidback. Luckily I don't encounter rednecks often.

Wow. Got a helluva prejudice streak in you.

I bet you're racist too, given your use of stereotypes.

Impressive.

Drolefille 05-10-2010 11:55 PM

I think she's well qualified and will bring a different perspective to the Court. I'm disappointed because I fear most of the discussion about her will be of the "transgender/lesbian/ugly" variety. (not to say of course that the three are inherently connected, just that all three will be used as a way to slam her.) If she were the first transgender or lesbian Justice that'd be awesome, but she's not.

Psi U MC Vito 05-11-2010 12:02 AM

Though I wonder why he didn't appoint her the first time around.

Drolefille 05-11-2010 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito (Post 1927184)
Though I wonder why he didn't appoint her the first time around.

She was interviewed at the time. Perhaps Obama made a mental priority list? He could have expected/hoped for 2 appointments in this term. And he could conceivably have a third.

deepimpact2 05-11-2010 12:13 AM

Not happy about it. Won't be voting for Obama again if he runs for re-election.

Drolefille 05-11-2010 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1927197)
Not happy about it. Won't be voting for Obama again if he runs for re-election.

Just curious, but why aren't you happy with the appointment?

Psi U MC Vito 05-11-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1927193)
She was interviewed at the time. Perhaps Obama made a mental priority list? He could have expected/hoped for 2 appointments in this term. And he could conceivably have a third.

Perhaps, and she was considered a strong candidate before he ever made office. and who is the third you think?

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1927197)
Not happy about it. Won't be voting for Obama again if he runs for re-election.

Why?

Drolefille 05-11-2010 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito (Post 1927202)
Perhaps, and she was considered a strong candidate before he ever made office. and who is the third you think?


Why?

It may have been as simple as giving her more time as SG. And I worry that Ginsberg may have to resign sooner than she would like for health/age reasons. For her sake I hope not, but you never know.

AOII Angel 05-11-2010 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elephant Walk (Post 1927130)
Wow. Got a helluva prejudice streak in you.

I bet you're racist too, given your use of stereotypes.

Impressive.

Ha ha! That's funny. I grew up farther south than you and have known enough rednecks to spot one. Don't need to stereotype, I've read enough of your posts to know. If you don't want to be labeled, be more careful of what you put out on the internet. And no, I'm not a racist, though I sure know a lot of them from my days in the south.

AOII Angel 05-11-2010 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1927207)
It may have been as simple as giving her more time as SG. And I worry that Ginsberg may have to resign sooner than she would like for health/age reasons. For her sake I hope not, but you never know.

From what I've heard on NPR, that's what the pundits think. This beefs up her credentials for the post.

SydneyK 05-11-2010 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1926937)
It is about both gender and sexual orientation. They are correlated.

I said it wasn't about gender because I think EW would've made a similar remark about a man who doesn't appear to fit the heterosexual mold. Perhaps a better way of putting it would've been that EW wasn't making a sexist remark. And generally, imo anyway, when people complain that a woman is being judged on something other than her credentials, it's a complaint that's rooted in sexism.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drolefille (Post 1927179)
I think she's well qualified and will bring a different perspective to the Court. I'm disappointed because I fear most of the discussion about her will be of the "transgender/lesbian/ugly" variety.

I think you're right, and GC's response (this thread) = case in point.

hijack
Welcome back, Drolefille! You do know we still love you even though your translation services are no longer needed on a regular basis, right? Stop being a stranger! :p
/hijack

Kevin 05-11-2010 09:29 AM

She's as qualified as anyone and she's replacing Brennan. The Court needs a strong liberal voice. I figure since guys like Roberts and Alito got a pass, she should too. I am a little disappointed in the fact that she is yet another justice selected from the ivory tower sorts of institutions. I wonder whether we'll ever see an attorney who has been in solo practice, who didn't graduate from an Ivy League school appointed to the SCOTUS. Looking back at the maelstrom that followed Miers' nomination, I doubt it.

MysticCat 05-11-2010 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1927276)
She's as qualified as anyone and she's replacing Brennan.

You mean Stevens? Or do you mean philosophical successor?

Quote:

I wonder whether we'll ever see an attorney who has been in solo practice, who didn't graduate from an Ivy League school appointed to the SCOTUS. Looking back at the maelstrom that followed Miers' nomination, I doubt it.
Solo practice, not likely. Not the right "track," I'm afraid. As for Ivy League, Stevens went to Northwestern Law School, and O'Conner went to Stanford. Not exactly Podunk College of Law, but not Ivy League either.

OT: Are you and your family okay after the storms in OKC?

Kevin 05-11-2010 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1927277)
You mean Stevens? Or do you mean philosophical successor?

Pardon my cerebral flatulence.

Quote:

Solo practice, not likely. Not the right "track," I'm afraid. As for Ivy League, Stevens went to Northwestern Law School, and O'Conner went to Stanford. Not exactly Podunk College of Law, but not Ivy League either.
Probably so.

Quote:

OT: Are you and your family okay after the storms in OKC?
Just fine. There was some damage 5-10 miles away from us, but we were unscathed. Didn't even see the softball-sized (wtf) hail. Luckily, most of the storm hit in the middle of nowhere out near southeastern Oklahoma, which is basically a godforsaken place where the chief exports are meth and marijuana. Any damage down there probably qualifies as blight removal. Any crop damage down there is probably uninsurable.

MysticCat 05-11-2010 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1927293)
Just fine. There was some damage 5-10 miles away from us, but we were unscathed. Didn't even see the softball-sized (wtf) hail.

Glad to hear it!

OT2: In light of your wistfulness about whether anyone will ever reach SCOTUS through other than the usual paths, may I highly recommend (to you and anyone else) Supreme Courtship by Christopher Buckley. Blurb:
In bestselling author Christopher Buckley's hilarious novel, the President of the United States, ticked off at the Senate for rejecting his nominees, decides to get even by nominating America's most popular TV judge to the Supreme Court.

President Donald Vanderdamp is having a hell of a time getting his nominees onto the Supreme Court. After one nominee is rejected for insufficiently appreciating To Kill a Mockingbird, the president chooses someone so beloved by voters that the Senate won't have the nerve to reject her--Judge Pepper Cartwright, star of the nation's most popular reality show. Will Pepper, a vivacious Texan, survive a Senate confirmation battle? Will becoming one of the most powerful women in the world ruin her love life? Soon, Pepper finds herself in the middle of a constitutional crisis, a presidential reelection campaign that the president is determined to lose, and oral arguments of a romantic nature. Supreme Courtship is another classic Christopher Buckley comedy about the Washington institutions most deserving of ridicule.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.