Reagan the new face of the $10 bill?

[abaici]

Originally posted by Rudey
Yeah sometimes I wake up and put on my sunglasses and live in pretend world too where results mean very little to me.

-Rudey

Well, I do live in California so I am able to suspend reality at my whim.

But, nice that you only focused on a small part of my statement. Again, early results mean very little. Some of his decisions will have long-range consequences that may very-well overshadow some of his early favorable results.

Originally posted by ktsnake Do you not think it's enough that Arnold has surrounded himself with experienced and smart people?

An effective manager will always surround themselves with experienced and smart people. However, I think that it is important that the manager is equally experienced and intelligent.

[PhiPsiRuss]

Charlie Schumer was on the boob tube this morning suggesting a much better alternative. Put Reagan on the $50 bill, instead of U.S. Grant. Grant was a great Civil War general, and has cool initials, but he was a mediocre president.

I like this idea much better. Hamilton should never be removed. He was far too important to developing America. He was the intellectual adversary of Jefferson, and it was these two minds, more than any other, that shaped the ideas of early America.

[preciousjeni]

Originally posted by madmax
I am against it but I don't see why Democrats would care. It's not like they are putting Reagan's pic on foodstamps. As long as his pic is put on a large denomination bill the Dems won't have to see him.

[abaici]

Originally posted by preciousjeni

Ignore that! Contrary to popular belief, all Demos are not poor and all Republicans are not rich.