Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostwriter
Typical liberal quasi"intelectualism".
|
1 - I'm not a liberal. (Pretty far from it in fact - check the firefighter thread for evidence)
2 - Intellectualism isn't a bad thing, even if knuckle-dragging politicos want you to believe it is.
Quote:
|
You don't like someone disagreeing with you. Now that you have proved that you know big words, I submit that you are a bigot. Your post shows an opinion based in intolerance for an opposing viewpoint.
|
You're correct - I'm bigoted against people who attempt to make grandiose points based on a situation that does not suggest anything resembling those points.
I'm also bigoted against bad logic, people who use batting average instead of OBP or better stats, people who think the "run sets up the pass" instead of the other way around, Sean Penn, fans of Two & a Half Men, and U2.
Everyone is bigoted. Some of those people will lose their jobs for it.
Quote:
|
But what is to be expected from a panty waist liberal know it all who feels the need to use sophistry and invectives when reasonable discourse is called for.
|
Ah yes, the part where you resort to insults, while yelling at me for insulting you? Great work out of you.
Quote:
|
[If you are a Kappa Sig, and I hope and pray you are not, you definitely do not understand the meaning of "a gentlemen and a man of honor". Grow up and STFU. I am ashamed to call you a brother.
|
Mu-Psi, 2000. Past GMC, proud alumni, donor, etc.
Be ashamed all you want. I didn't insult you or your upbringing, I didn't do anything that wasn't gentlemanly, and I feel that expressing myself and fighting what I perceive to be ignorance is one of the most honorable things possible.
I attacked your ideas because I disagreed with them. Not because of any personal characteristic about you - I don't know you, and we've both agreed and disagreed in threads (to my knowledge). It's called the Fundamental Attribution Theorem - read up a bit, then take attacks on ideas as just that, and not personal attacks.
Linear Mode
