GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Delta > Delta Sigma Theta
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,896
Threads: 115,688
Posts: 2,207,101
Welcome to our newest member, zaleisshulzeo10
» Online Users: 3,407
0 members and 3,407 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 01-28-2005, 03:28 PM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,563
Quote:
Originally posted by Proverbs31
I find it hard to believe that something like this would be legal.
If they apply it to all workers (i.e. present workers have to quit or lose their job) it's perfectly legal - like Disney and other companies with really strict dress codes. However, not hiring smokers but letting those who are already employed continue to smoke could really set them up for a lawsuit.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-28-2005, 08:19 PM
sunflower02 sunflower02 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally posted by 33girl
If they apply it to all workers (i.e. present workers have to quit or lose their job) it's perfectly legal - like Disney and other companies with really strict dress codes. However, not hiring smokers but letting those who are already employed continue to smoke could really set them up for a lawsuit.

Disney enforcing a strict dress code is not the same as discriminating against smokers; the dresscode is what you do while you are at work and bears no restraints on how you dress when you're not working - this is NOT discrimination, it's a rule at WORK. Not hiring someone because they smoke IS discrimination-it's discrimination against smokers.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-30-2005, 03:08 PM
AlphaFrog AlphaFrog is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Ozdust Ballroom
Posts: 14,837
Quote:
Originally posted by sunflower02
Disney enforcing a strict dress code is not the same as discriminating against smokers; the dresscode is what you do while you are at work and bears no restraints on how you dress when you're not working - this is NOT discrimination, it's a rule at WORK. Not hiring someone because they smoke IS discrimination-it's discrimination against smokers.

Ok, I know that I'm getting flamed for this one, but...

I don't think discriminating against smokers needs to be illegal, as smoking is a choice, where being a certain gender, race, age, etc... is not. If a company is looking for a non-smoker, and you really want the job...don't smoke. (Ok, I know for some people it's very hard to quit, but not impossible.) Although to be fair, I do think that they should have to list non-smoker in the job description.
__________________
Facile remedium est ubertati; sterilia nullo labore vincuntur.
I think pearls are lovely, especially when you need something to clutch. ~ AzTheta
The Real World Can't Hear You ~ GC Troll
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.