GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,562
Threads: 115,660
Posts: 2,204,566
Welcome to our newest member, ustincahvs8126
» Online Users: 1,488
1 members and 1,487 guests
Zach
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 12-14-2004, 11:17 PM
IowaStatePhiPsi IowaStatePhiPsi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,624
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/featu...369643,00.html
'We have to protect people'

President Bush wants 'pro-homosexual' drama banned. Gary Taylor meets the politician in charge of making it happen

Thursday December 9, 2004
The Guardian

What should we do with US classics like Cat on a Hot Tin Roof or The Color Purple? "Dig a hole," Gerald Allen recommends, "and dump them in it." Don't laugh. Gerald Allen's book-burying opinions are not a joke.

Earlier this week, Allen got a call from Washington. He will be meeting with President Bush on Monday. I asked him if this was his first invitation to the White House. "Oh no," he laughs. "It's my fifth meeting with Mr Bush."

Bush is interested in Allen's opinions because Allen is an elected Republican representative in the Alabama state legislature. He is Bush's base. Last week, Bush's base introduced a bill that would ban the use of state funds to purchase any books or other materials that "promote homosexuality". Allen does not want taxpayers' money to support "positive depictions of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle". That's why Tennessee Williams and Alice Walker have got to go.

I ask Allen what prompted this bill. Was one of his children exposed to something in school that he considered inappropriate? Did he see some flamingly gay book displayed prominently at the public library?

No, nothing like that. "It was election day," he explains. Last month, "14 states passed referendums defining marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman". Exit polls asked people what they considered the most important issue, and "moral values in this country" were "the top of the list".

"Traditional family values are under attack," Allen informs me. They've been under attack "for the last 40 years". The enemy, this time, is not al-Qaida. The axis of evil is "Hollywood, the music industry". We have an obligation to "save society from moral destruction". We have to prevent liberal libarians and trendy teachers from "re-engineering society's fabric in the minds of our children". We have to "protect Alabamians".

I ask him, again, for specific examples. Although heterosexuals are apparently an endangered species in Alabama, and although Allen is a local politician who lives a couple miles from my house, he can't produce any local examples. "Go on the internet," he recommends. "Some time when you've got a week to spare," he jokes, "just go on the internet. You'll see."

Actually, I go on the internet every day. But I'm obviously searching for different things. For Allen, the web is just the largest repository in history of urban myths. The internet is even better than the Bible when it comes to spreading unverifiable, unrefutable stories. And urban myths are political realities. Remember, it was an urban myth (an invented court case about a sex education teacher gang-raped by her own students who, when she protested, laughed and said: "But we're just doing what you taught us!") that all but killed sex education in America.

Since Allen couldn't give me a single example of the homosexual equivalent of 9/11, I gave him some. This autumn the University of Alabama theatre department put on an energetic revival of A Chorus Line, which includes, besides "tits and ass", a prominent gay solo number. Would Allen's bill prevent university students from performing A Chorus Line? It isn't that he's against the theatre, Allen explains. "But why can't you do something else?" (They have done other things, of course. But I didn't think it would be a good idea to mention their sold-out productions of Angels in America and The Rocky Horror Show.)

Cutting off funds to theatre departments that put on A Chorus Line or Cat on a Hot Tin Roof may look like censorship, and smell like censorship, but "it's not censorship", Allen hastens to explain. "For instance, there's a reason for stop lights. You're driving a vehicle, you see that stop light, and I hope you stop." Who can argue with something as reasonable as stop lights? Of course, if you're gay, this particular traffic light never changes to green.

It would not be the first time Cat on a Hot Tin Roof ran into censorship. As Nicholas de Jongh documents in his amusingly appalling history of government regulation of the British theatre, the British establishment was no more enthusiastic, half a century ago, than Alabama's Allen. "Once again Mr Williams vomits up the recurring theme of his not too subconscious," the Lord Chamberlain's Chief Examiner wrote in 1955. In the end, it was first performed in London at the New Watergate Club, for "members only", thereby slipping through a loophole in the censorship laws.

But more than one gay playwright is at a stake here. Allen claims he is acting to "encourage and protect our culture". Does "our culture" include Shakespeare? I ask Allen if he would insist that copies of Shakespeare's sonnets be removed from all public libraries. I point out to him that Romeo and Juliet was originally performed by an all-male cast, and that in Shakespeare's lifetime actors and audiences at the public theatres were all accused of being "sodomites". When Romeo wished he "was a glove upon that hand", the cheek that he fantasised about kissing was a male cheek. Next March the Alabama Shakespeare festival will be performing a new production of As You Like It, and its famous scene of a man wooing another man. The Alabama Shakespeare Festival is also the State Theatre of Alabama. Would Allen's bill cut off state funding for Shakespeare?

"Well," he begins, after a pause, "the current draft of the bill does not address how that is going to be handled. I expect details like that to be worked out at the committee stage. Literature like Shakespeare and Hammet [sic] could be left alone." Could be. Not "would be". In any case, he says, "you could tone it down". That way, if you're not paying real close attention, even a college graduate like Allen himself "could easily miss" what was going on, the "subtle" innuendoes and all.

So he regards his gay book ban as a work in progress. His legislation is "a single spoke in the wheel, it doesn't resolve all the issues". This is just the beginning. "To turn a big ship around it takes a lot of time."

But make no mistake, the ship is turning. You can see that on the face of Cornelius Carter, a professor of dance at Alabama and a prize-winning choreographer who, not long ago, was named university teacher of the year for the entire US. Carter is black. He is also gay, and tired of fighting these battles. "I don't know," he says, "if I belong here any more."

Forty years ago, the American defenders of "our culture" and "traditional values" were opposing racial integration. Now, no politician would dare attack Cornelius Carter for being black. But it's perfectly acceptable to discriminate against people for what they do in bed.

"Dig a hole," Gerald Allen recommends, "and dump them in it."

Of course, Allen was talking about books. He was just talking about books. He never said anything about pink triangles.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-14-2004, 11:19 PM
IowaStatePhiPsi IowaStatePhiPsi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,624

Canon Fodder
We're Here, We're Not Queer, and We Hate Minorities: American Censorship in 2004

Feel a chill in the air? What better way to warm up than by burning a book?
By Matt Hutaff Dec 14, 2004

To those who enjoy discriminating against their fellow citizen and think we're doing the Lord's work in the Middle East, I ask you this: what the fuck is wrong with Holden Caulfield?

With so many things to hate – blacks, Jews, Mexicans, the French, liberals, city-folk – are you so filled with bigoted, hateful emotions that you need to draw down your ire on fictional characters?

Gerald Allen thinks so. As a member of the Alabama House of Representatives, he's written a bill that would prohibit public funds from being used to purchase "textbooks or library materials that recognize or promote homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle." The reason for this? Protecting children from a subversive "homosexual agenda," of course.

"Our culture, how we know it today, is under attack from every angle," Allen said in a press conference last week. Thankfully, though, the concrete surrounding Allen's brain is tolerance-proof.

While I'm sure there are many concerned parents hoping their son or daughter don't listen to k.d. lang or visit the bath houses, I charge them to explain how censoring popular American fiction from their community is a positive thing.

You see, Allen's ban doesn't just keep Playgirl and Lynne Cheney's travesty of literature Sisters off of library shelves; it attacks cherished mainstream novels and plays like The Color Purple, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof and Brideshead Revisited, even to adults aware of the content. Does Allen care? Of course not. His recommendation is to "dig a hole and dump them in it."

Allen's bill even prevents community colleges from performing A Chorus Line because it features a prominent gay solo. "Why can't you do something else?" he asks.

Something else? How about Shakespeare? The Bard may have penned some of the most memorable fiction in the English language, but there are homosexual undertones throughout his work. Coupled that with the "risqué" origins of his theater (men-only productions were common practice) and comedies like As You Like It suddenly becomes an endangered species list as well. So how about that?

"Well... literature like Shakespeare and Hammet [sic] could be [emphasis mine] left alone." But, he adds, "you could tone it down."

How about this, Ger? You tone down your hillbilly rhetoric and learn to spell and I'll tone down my seething hatred for moralist pricks. That sound reasonable, you ass?

This is not an isolated example, by the way. Andrea Minnon, a Maine resident, wants Catcher in the Rye banned from her son's freshman reading program as well because it "espouses immoral ideas." Apparently Minnon has lived in a bubble for 50 years and is only now catching up on the controversy the book has generated, but at least she's reading the book herself to see if it's something she wants her child to read. That's how a child is protected – involved parenting, not draconian public policy.

But Gerald Allen has the ear of the President of the United States. In the past several months, Allen has met with George Bush five times to discuss his mandate on moral issues. Bush considers Allen part of his base constituency, and according to that, Americans hate even the notion that a homosexual might have any positive traits whatsoever.

This is not an argument on the value of gay men and women in American society. I believe all have the potential for greatness or idiocy regardless of race, creed, faith or sexuality. Nor is this an argument on the quality of the content of the books proposed banned under Allen's legislation, as I'm sure some are just plain awful.

This is about censorship, pure and simple.

There is nothing to be gained from book banning save a fascist America because one particular mindset doesn't agree with some of the content. Books are by and large an individual experience, tailored to appeal to a particular audience.

However, some books transcend genre and speak to an entire society. While I won't argue that Tennessee Williams is a sad, closeted hack, his stories bring awareness to Middle America that there are uncomfortable issues with homosexuality or pseudo-feminisism somewhere else in their country. Every person I've spoken to about Catcher in the Rye finds something relatable about it in its pages despite the controversy. These kinds of stories are precisely the ones that should be available to the masses because they invite shock or outrage and transport its readers to a different mindset. And what is point of literature if not to provoke discussion?

Strip away positive stories about subjugated minorities and all you are left with is demonization and falsehood. Look to Iraq as an example; a region with thousands of years of rich cultural heritage has been turned into the land of fanatical savages moving to the beat of the American war drum.

The literary heritage of the United States, once lively and eager to publish views contrary to the prevailing winds of politics, is now falling into the same intolerant religious rut that the government has fallen prey to. This is the country that printed and revered dissident poet Boris Pasternak's sweeping indictment of Soviet culture, Dr. Zhivago. Now it is a country that does all it can to limit the number of voices that can be heard.

How times have changed.

So where does it end? The mere mention of a homosexual curdles your blood? I guarantee striking gays from the reading list will only be the beginning. Soon anything contrary to the government, the Christian God or this arbitrary set of morals that has so enraptured millions they're afraid of thinking about two men kissing will be verboten. Even worse, by limiting the type of voice that can be heard people will grow up ignorant and afraid of people different than themselves, and that's a sad thing to think about.

Gore Vidal, a critic of George W. Bush's regime, could find himself out of work because no one will hire a gay writer writing his obviously gay views. Looking for the new Elton John record? He's a queer – no dice.

Once this way of thinking starts, it cannot stop. If a hayseed like Gerald Allen can bend the ear of the President and espouse a message of intolerance for gays, who's to say he and his followers can't target another group for vilification?

According to fiction writer Ray Bradbury, 451 degrees Fahrenheit is the temperature at which books burn. Does the political climate have to get that hot before real freedom-loving Americans get uncomfortable with supporting such a regime?

Canon Fodder is a biweekly analysis of politics and society.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:12 AM
Phasad1913 Phasad1913 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 578
so uhhh, what was wrong with the Color Purple?
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-15-2004, 10:00 AM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally posted by emleepc
It's makes me sad that there are people in the world that have to bad mouth other states. There must not be much else to talk about wherever you are from. Pity.
It's also sad that one person is exercising his right to "freedom of speech" and is attempting to change something that he believes is wrong. Whether this banning of books happens or not, here in all the United States of America, (Alabama included), he is exercising his right to the freedom of speech.

Why don't we all get worked up about something else worthwhile?


ETA: Bring on the flaming, I know it's coming.....
SAYING he wants to have books banned is fine. Going ahead and banning books is not. Freedom of speech does not protect the banning of books. He can stand on the rooftops and say he wants the books banned, but actually doing it would cross the line.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12-15-2004, 10:15 AM
aurora_borealis aurora_borealis is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally posted by Phasad1913
so uhhh, what was wrong with the Color Purple?
Nothing in my world, but perhaps the dynamic between Celie and Shug Avery offends the delicate sensibilities of some.

Or to be snarky, perhaps it is because PURPLE is in the title and we all know PURPLE is the color of TEH GAYZ since Tinky Winky the Teletubbie was purple and carried a purse.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 12-16-2004, 01:46 PM
XOMichelle XOMichelle is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,516
Quote:
Originally posted by valkyrie
I must put a gay character in my novel so that if it's ever published, I can have the honor of having it banned in Alabama.
Awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 12-16-2004, 02:23 PM
Rudey Rudey is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
Quote:
Originally posted by Phasad1913
so uhhh, what was wrong with the Color Purple?
Oprah.

-Rudey
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 02-11-2005, 06:59 AM
IowaStatePhiPsi IowaStatePhiPsi is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,624
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/02/021005novel.htm
Gay Novel & Shovel Sent To Book Banning Senator
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff
Posted: February 10, 2005 9:01 pm. ET

(Los Angeles, California) Gay novelist, Michael Holloway Perronne, shipped a copy of his novel, A Time Before Me, along with a miniature shovel, to controversial Alabama lawmaker Rep. Gerald Allen on Thursday.

Allen recently made headlines by proposing a state law that would ban gay books, plays, and films at public institutions. (story)

If his bill became law, public school textbooks could not present views on homosexuality, college theater groups would not be able to perform plays like the Tennessee Williams classic "Cat On A Hot Tin Roof" or The Laramie Project, and public school libraries could not display books that include lesbianism like Alice Walker's "The Color Purple."

During the uproar over the proposed law Allen said, “I guess we dig a big hole and dump them in and bury them.”

Perronne said if Allen wins he wants his debut novel to be in good company.

“If Mr. Allen is determined to bury such great works as The Color Purple, The Picture of Dorian Gray, and Brideshead Revisited, then I would be honored to have my own work buried with such classics. Mr. Allen can use the shovel I sent him to start digging his hole.”

"A Time Before Me" explores a gay teen’s search for his identity in the contrasting worlds of small town Mississippi and New Orleans.

Perronne is an adult education instructor and writer living in Los Angeles but he says he will always call the Deep South home.

“Coming out in the South, I think, is a very different experience than it is coming out in the rest of the country- both positive and negative.

"When I tell people I came out at 17 and in the Deep South (Mississippi), people often assume it must have been a horrible time in my life. I actually experienced the opposite. Sure, there is homophobia there, but there’s also a large percentage of the population that’s a lot more open minded that the media presents Southerners as a whole. It’s important to me that people see that not everyone in the South has the same mindset as Mr. Allen.”
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 02-11-2005, 07:28 AM
Senusret I Senusret I is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,783
Okay, but I hope everyone knows he did that for the publicity.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.